BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of facet joint signal change in acute/subacute lumbar vertebral body compression fractures is unknown. We hypothesized that facet joint signal change on MR imaging is more common in facet joints associated with an acute/subacute lumbar compression fracture than those associated with normal vertebral bodies or ones that have a chronic compression fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three neuroradiologists and a neuroradiology fellow retrospectively graded facet joint inflammatory change on MR imaging in 900 facet joints in 75 patients with at least 1 painful osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture. Facet joint signal change was assessed on T2-weighted images with chemical fat-saturation, STIR images, and/or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images with chemical fat-saturation. Each facet joint from the T12/L1 to L5/S1 level was assessed individually. An overall facet joint signal-change score, which is a composite measure of the grade of signal change for all 4 facet joints associated with a given lumbar vertebral level, was devised, and statistical significance was assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: The overall facet joint signal-change scores were significantly higher at vertebral body levels affected by an acute/subacute compression fracture compared with control levels, which were associated with either normal bodies or chronic compression fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an association between facet joint signal change on MR imaging and acute/subacute lumbar vertebral body compression fractures.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of facet joint signal change in acute/subacute lumbar vertebral body compression fractures is unknown. We hypothesized that facet joint signal change on MR imaging is more common in facet joints associated with an acute/subacute lumbar compression fracture than those associated with normal vertebral bodies or ones that have a chronic compression fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three neuroradiologists and a neuroradiology fellow retrospectively graded facet joint inflammatory change on MR imaging in 900 facet joints in 75 patients with at least 1 painful osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture. Facet joint signal change was assessed on T2-weighted images with chemical fat-saturation, STIR images, and/or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images with chemical fat-saturation. Each facet joint from the T12/L1 to L5/S1 level was assessed individually. An overall facet joint signal-change score, which is a composite measure of the grade of signal change for all 4 facet joints associated with a given lumbar vertebral level, was devised, and statistical significance was assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: The overall facet joint signal-change scores were significantly higher at vertebral body levels affected by an acute/subacute compression fracture compared with control levels, which were associated with either normal bodies or chronic compression fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an association between facet joint signal change on MR imaging and acute/subacute lumbar vertebral body compression fractures.
Authors: Spiros G Pneumaticos; Sofia N Chatziioannou; John A Hipp; Warren H Moore; Stephen I Esses Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Paul Shekelle; Robert Hopkins; Mary Ann Forciea; Douglas K Owens Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M H J Voormolen; W J van Rooij; Y van der Graaf; P N M Lohle; L E H Lampmann; J R Juttmann; M Sluzewski Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Mark V Boswell; Vijay Singh; Richard Derby; Bert Fellows; Frank J E Falco; Sukdeb Datta; Howard S Smith; Joshua A Hirsch Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: David F Kallmes; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; David J Wilson; Terry H Diamond; Richard Edwards; Leigh A Gray; Lydia Stout; Sara Owen; William Hollingworth; Basavaraj Ghdoke; Deborah J Annesley-Williams; Stuart H Ralston; Jeffrey G Jarvik Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; Peter R Ebeling; John D Wark; Peter Mitchell; Chris Wriedt; Stephen Graves; Margaret P Staples; Bridie Murphy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Klaus M Friedrich; Stefan Nemec; Philipp Peloschek; Katja Pinker; Michael Weber; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Alicia Santiago Chinchilla; Luis Guzmán Álvarez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela; Maria Del Mar Castellano García; Miguel Pajares López Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2014-06-28
Authors: Vance T Lehman; Robert C Murphy; Louis A Schenck; Rickey E Carter; Geoffrey B Johnson; Amy L Kotsenas; Jonathan M Morris; Mark A Nathan; John T Wald; Timothy P Maus Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630