Literature DB >> 21487701

Facet joint injections as a means of reducing the need for vertebroplasty in insufficiency fractures of the spine.

David J Wilson1, Sara Owen, Rufus A Corkill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent publications compared treatment of vertebral fractures reporting improvement in the majority but with no significant difference between the local anaesthetic and vertebroplasty groups. Potential explanations include placebo response or therapeutic response to the "control procedure". We investigated whether preliminary facet joint injection can identify those patients whose pain arises from paravertebral structures rather than the vertebral insufficiency fracture itself.
METHODS: Patients referred for treatment by vertebroplasty were first offered local anaesthetic and steroid facet joint injection (FJI) at the most painful level. Those who failed to respond were offered a vertebroplasty.
RESULTS: Ninety one patients referred, 16 went straight to vertebroplasty. Sixty one of 75 were initially offered FJI. Twenty one were successful; two relapsed, had further FJIs with good results; three declined treatment; 5 had temporary benefit; 1 died from unrelated causes. Of 29 who failed to respond to FJIs, 24 underwent vertebroplasty and 23 had a successful outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: A third of patients technically suitable for vertebroplasty responded beneficially to FJI. In this group the pain mediator maybe one of instability and overload on the facet joints produced by adjacent wedge fracture. This protocol allows more selective and more successful vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487701     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2115-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.

Authors:  H. Deramond; C. Depriester; P. Toussaint; P. Galibert
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  [Vertebroplasty: 10 years clinical and radiological follow-up].

Authors:  J Franc; P Lehmann; G Saliou; P Monet; E-M Kocheida; E Daguet; A Laurent; D Legars; H Deramond
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.447

3.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral body compression fracture secondary to osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Parag M Rami; J Kevin McGraw; Eric V Heatwole; Jeffrey M Boorstein
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Complete percutaneous treatment of vertebral body tumors causing spinal canal compromise using a transpedicular cavitation, cement augmentation, and radiosurgical technique.

Authors:  Peter C Gerszten; Edward A Monaco
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 5.  Comprehensive management of symptomatic and aggressive vertebral hemangiomas.

Authors:  Frank L Acosta; Nader Sanai; John H Chi; Christopher F Dowd; Cynthia Chin; Tarik Tihan; Dean Chou; Philip R Weinstein; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Robert Rotter; Heiner Martin; Sebastian Fuerderer; Michael Gabl; Christoph Roeder; Paul Heini; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Treatment of metastatic spinal tumors by percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with interstitial implantation of 125I seeds.

Authors:  Zuozhang Yang; Dakuan Yang; Lin Xie; Yuqing Sun; Yunchao Huang; Hongpu Sun; Pengjie Liu; Zhongxiong Wu
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  David F Kallmes; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; David J Wilson; Terry H Diamond; Richard Edwards; Leigh A Gray; Lydia Stout; Sara Owen; William Hollingworth; Basavaraj Ghdoke; Deborah J Annesley-Williams; Stuart H Ralston; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; Peter R Ebeling; John D Wark; Peter Mitchell; Chris Wriedt; Stephen Graves; Margaret P Staples; Bridie Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Review of the European Congress of Radiology musculoskeletal scientific program.

Authors:  Andrew J Grainger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Critique of the analysis of UpToDate.com on the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures: time to update UpToDate.

Authors:  D P Beall; W P McRoberts; S H Berven; J T Ledlie; S M Tutton; B P Parsons
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Health economic aspects of vertebral augmentation procedures.

Authors:  F Borgström; D P Beall; S Berven; S Boonen; S Christie; D F Kallmes; J A Kanis; G Olafsson; A J Singer; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Comparative review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Alicia Santiago Chinchilla; Luis Guzmán Álvarez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela; Maria Del Mar Castellano García; Miguel Pajares López
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

Review 6.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Authors:  G Zhao; X Liu; F Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment and placebo in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: meta-analysis and critical review of the literature.

Authors:  A J Láinez Ramos-Bossini; D López Zúñiga; F Ruiz Santiago
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Diana Andrei; Iulian Popa; Silviu Brad; Aida Iancu; Manuel Oprea; Cristina Vasilian; Dan V Poenaru
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Facet joint signal change on MRI at levels of acute/subacute lumbar compression fractures.

Authors:  V T Lehman; C P Wood; C H Hunt; R E Carter; J B Allred; F E Diehn; J M Morris; J T Wald; K R Thielen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty and nonsurgical management in patients hospitalised with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a UK cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A Svedbom; L Alvares; C Cooper; D Marsh; O Ström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.