Literature DB >> 23447435

Excellent quality of life after liver transplantation for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Sarwa Darwish Murad1, Julie K Heimbach, Gregory J Gores, Charles B Rosen, Joanne T Benson, W Ray Kim.   

Abstract

Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by liver transplantation (LT) have excellent survival. However, little is known about their quality of life (QOL). We assessed the QOL of these patients and compared it to the QOL of patients who underwent transplantation for other liver diseases. From 1993 to 2010, 129 CCA patients underwent LT, and 93 (72%) were alive as of November 2010. All recipients were sent a previously validated QOL questionnaire composed of disease-specific QOL metrics (liver disease symptoms, Karnofsky score, health perception, and index of well-being) and generic QOL metrics [Short Form 36 (SF-36) and European Quality of Life (EuroQol)]. These recipients were compared to 110 transplant recipients with other liver diseases (excluding hepatitis C). Among the recipients with CCA, the response rate was 85% (n = 79). Patients with CCA did significantly better on liver disease symptoms (3.3 versus 3.2, P = 0.05), the Karnofsky score (90.8 versus 86.6, P = 0.03), the SF-36 Physical Functioning domain (52.0 versus 46.3, P < 0.001), and the EuroQol Mobility category (10% versus 33%, P = 0.001), and they rated their overall health better in comparison with non-CCA patients (85.9 versus 80.7, P = 0.02). CCA patients scored consistently higher on all other domains, albeit without significant differences. The observed differences in QOL remained unchanged when adjustments were made for demographic factors, including the level of education. In conclusion, patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by LT for perihilar CCA reported excellent QOL that was equal to or better than that of recipients with other liver diseases. These results are important in light of the continued debate about the feasibility of this aggressive treatment in patients with perihilar CCA.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23447435     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  8 in total

Review 1.  Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making.

Authors:  Irinel Popescu; Traian Dumitrascu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Current diagnostic and management options in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Health-related quality of life and affective status in liver transplant recipients and patients on the waiting list with low MELD scores.

Authors:  Christian Benzing; Nicco Krezdorn; Julia Förster; Andreas Hinz; Felix Krenzien; Georgi Atanasov; Moritz Schmelzle; Hans-Michael Hau; Michael Bartels
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.647

4.   Intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: Management and outcomes.

Authors:  David Waseem; Patel Tushar
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb 2017       Impact factor: 2.400

Review 5.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis, treatment options, and management.

Authors:  Kevin C Soares; Ihab Kamel; David P Cosgrove; Joseph M Herman; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  Current status of the organ replacement approach for malignancies and an overture for organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Masahiro Shinoda; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies.

Authors:  Kerstin Wohlleber; Patrick Heger; Pascal Probst; Christoph Engel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.