Introduction and aims. Cholangiocarcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors that can be classified into three clinically distinct types of cancers, intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. The inconsistent use of nomenclature for these cancers has obscured a true knowledge of the epidemiology, natural history and response to therapy of these cancers. Our aims were to define demographic characteristics, management and outcomes of these three distinct cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients enrolled in an institutional cancer registry from 1992 to 2010. Median survival was compared between different treatment modalities over three time periods for the three types of cholangiocarcinoma at different stages of the disease using Kaplan Meyer analysis. RESULTS: 242 patients were identified. All cases were reviewed and classified into intrahepatic (90 patients), distal (48 patients) or perihilar (104 patients) cholangiocarcinomas. These cancers differed in median age of onset, gender distribution, median survival and stage. 13.8% of patients presented with stage I, 5.8% with stage II, 9.6% with stage III, 28% with stage IV, with 41.8% having unknown stage. The overall median survival was 15.8 months, and was 23, 25, 14, and 4.5 months for stages I, II, III, and IV respectively. Surgery improved survival in both early and advanced stages. Multimodality therapies further improved outcomes, particularly for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Perihilar, distal and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vary in their presentation, natural history and therapeutic approach to management. A consistently applied classification is essential for meaningful interpretation of studies of these cancers.
Introduction and aims. Cholangiocarcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors that can be classified into three clinically distinct types of cancers, intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. The inconsistent use of nomenclature for these cancers has obscured a true knowledge of the epidemiology, natural history and response to therapy of these cancers. Our aims were to define demographic characteristics, management and outcomes of these three distinct cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients enrolled in an institutional cancer registry from 1992 to 2010. Median survival was compared between different treatment modalities over three time periods for the three types of cholangiocarcinoma at different stages of the disease using Kaplan Meyer analysis. RESULTS: 242 patients were identified. All cases were reviewed and classified into intrahepatic (90 patients), distal (48 patients) or perihilar (104 patients) cholangiocarcinomas. These cancers differed in median age of onset, gender distribution, median survival and stage. 13.8% of patients presented with stage I, 5.8% with stage II, 9.6% with stage III, 28% with stage IV, with 41.8% having unknown stage. The overall median survival was 15.8 months, and was 23, 25, 14, and 4.5 months for stages I, II, III, and IV respectively. Surgery improved survival in both early and advanced stages. Multimodality therapies further improved outcomes, particularly for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Perihilar, distal and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vary in their presentation, natural history and therapeutic approach to management. A consistently applied classification is essential for meaningful interpretation of studies of these cancers.
Authors: A Nakeeb; H A Pitt; T A Sohn; J Coleman; R A Abrams; S Piantadosi; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Shahid A Khan; Shireen Emadossadaty; Nimzing G Ladep; Howard C Thomas; Paul Elliott; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mireille B Toledano Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: J W Valle; H Wasan; P Johnson; E Jones; L Dixon; R Swindell; S Baka; A Maraveyas; P Corrie; S Falk; S Gollins; F Lofts; L Evans; T Meyer; A Anthoney; T Iveson; M Highley; R Osborne; J Bridgewater Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Caitlin Hester; Ibrahim Nassour; Beverley Adams-Huet; Mathew Augustine; Michael A Choti; Rebecca M Minter; John C Mansour; Patricio M Polanco; Matthew R Porembka; Sam C Wang; Adam C Yopp Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Lucas Poleto Spinola; Gabriel F Vieira; Rafael Fernandes Ferreira; Maria C J Calastri; Graciele D Tenani; Franciana L Aguiar; Ilka F Santana Ferreira Boin; Larissa B E Da Costa; Maria Fernanda Chaim Correia; Eliane M Zanovelo; Daniele C B De Souza; Rita C Martins Alves Da Silva; Renato Ferreira Da Silva; Ana Margarida Coelho Abrantes; Maria Filomena R R Botelho; Jose Guilherme L R Tralhão; Doroteia R S Souza Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Ashwyn K Sharma; Jorge de la Torre; Nikki S IJzerman; Thomas L Sutton; Beiqun Zhao; Tahsin M Khan; Sudeep Banerjee; Christina Cui; Vi Nguyen; Maha Alkhuziem; Petur Snaebjornsson; Hester van Boven; Annemarie Bruining; Chih-Min Tang; Hyunho Yoon; Alexa De la Fuente; Shumei Kato; Hitendra Patel; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Santiago Horgan; Adam M Burgoyne; Paul Fanta; Jill P Mesirov; Andrew M Blakely; Jeremy L Davis; Skye C Mayo; Winan J van Houdt; Neeltje Steeghs; Jason K Sicklick Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531