Literature DB >> 23446591

Outcomes of traditional cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting: a retrospective analysis of 1008 patients.

Keith C Neaman1, Shannon D Armstrong, Marissa E Baca, Mark Albert, Douglas L Vander Woude, John D Renucci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic operative procedures. Few large studies have examined outcomes of cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting. The authors explored postoperative outcome and the preoperative and intraoperative factors that may contribute to these complications.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty over an 11-year period was performed. Baseline patient demographics, intraoperative technique, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were analyzed to determine characteristics that predispose patients to complications and undesirable outcomes.
RESULTS: The 1008 study patients underwent either a full or modified abdominoplasty with a total complication rate of 32.6 percent. The most common complication was seroma (15.4 percent). Liposuction of the abdominal flap was performed in 469 patients (46.5 percent) and liposuction of the flanks was performed in 555 patients (55.1 percent). Chi-square analysis followed by logistic regression revealed that liposuction of the flanks and abdomen was independently associated with seroma formation in addition to major and minor complications (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Seroma formation following abdominoplasty is the most common complication. Concomitant liposuction of the flanks and abdomen with the addition of aggressive undermining leads to higher seroma rates. This association is likely multifactorial and may be secondary to increased resorptive demands placed on the abdominal lymphatics in the setting of greater dead space and larger fluid shifts as a result of liposuction. To reduce seroma rates, surgeons should avoid aggressive liposuction and undermining, particularly in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446591     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6fc3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  24 in total

1.  Effect of Posthospital Syndrome on Health Care Utilization After Abdominal Contouring Surgery.

Authors:  Peter R Swiatek; Shepard P Johnson; Lu Wang; Mochuan Liu; Ting-Ting Chung; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Comparative analysis on the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) vs conventional electrosurgery in post-bariatric abdominoplasty: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Torsten Schlosshauer; Marcus Kiehlmann; Marc-Oliver Riener; Robert Sader; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  A stitch in time: an unusual cause of enterovesical fistula.

Authors:  John Matthew O'Callaghan; Jason Timothy Boyd; Anjana Singh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-09-19

4.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Postbariatric Lower Body Lift-A Method of Decreasing Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Carmen Giuglea; Elena-Cristina Burlacu; Serban Dumitrache; Mirela-Georgiana Tene; Andrei Marin; Dana Mihaela Jianu; Silviu-Adrian Marinescu
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 5.  Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wilson A Wijaya; Yu Liu; YinHai He; Yong Qing; Zhengyong Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Abdominal Body Contouring: A Comparative Matched Analysis of Outcomes and Cost.

Authors:  Martin P Morris; Adrienne N Christopher; Viren Patel; Ginikanwa Onyekaba; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 0.558

7.  Minimizing the Short-term Reoperation Rate in Abdominoplasty Procedures by Prolonged Postoperative Immobilization.

Authors:  Karl Schwaiger; Stephanie Tiede; Wolfgang Hitzl; Rene Kaplan; Frederik DeMeyer; Klemens Heinrich; Michaela Hladik; Gottfried Wechselberger; Elisabeth Russe
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  The Global Prevalence of Seroma After Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader Salari; Behnaz Fatahi; Yalda Bartina; Mohsen Kazeminia; Mohammadbagher Heydari; Masoud Mohammadi; Mahvan Hemmati; Shamarina Shohaimi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Dissection Technique for Abdominoplasty: A Prospective Study on Scalpel versus Diathermocoagulation (Coagulation Mode).

Authors:  Rita Valença-Filipe; Apolino Martins; Álvaro Silva; Luis O Vásconez; José Amarante; António Costa-Ferreira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 10.  Minimising complications in abdominoplasty: An approach based on the root cause analysis and focused preventive steps.

Authors:  Mohan Rangaswamy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.