Literature DB >> 34080041

The Global Prevalence of Seroma After Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nader Salari1, Behnaz Fatahi2, Yalda Bartina3, Mohsen Kazeminia2, Mohammadbagher Heydari4, Masoud Mohammadi5, Mahvan Hemmati2, Shamarina Shohaimi6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty is one of the most common cosmetic surgeries performed worldwide. Seroma is also the most common local complication associated with abdominoplasty, which increases care costs, reduces patient satisfaction, and has serious complications for patients. Results of previous studies report different levels of seroma prevalence after abdominoplasty. The aim of this study is to standardize the statistics of the prevalence of seroma after abdominoplasty using meta-analysis.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, data from studies conducted on the global prevalence of seroma after abdominoplasty was extracted using the keywords "Prevalence, Epidemiology, Complications, Abdominoplasty, Seroma, and Lipo abdominoplasty" in the databases of Science, Scientific Information Database, MagIran, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar search engine without time limit until October 2020. The random-effects model was used to analyze the eligible studies, and the heterogeneity of the studies was investigated with the I2 index. Data analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 2).
RESULTS: In reviewing 143 studies (five studies related to Asia, 55 studies related to Europe, three studies related to Africa, and 80 studies related to the Americas) with a total sample size of 27834 individuals, the global prevalence of seroma after abdominoplasty was obtained as 10.9% (95% CI: 9.3-3.6.6%) and the highest prevalence of seroma was related to the Europe continent with 12.8% (95% CI: 10.15-3.9%). The results from meta-regression showed a declining trend in the global prevalence of seroma after abdominoplasty with an increase in the sample size, age of study participants, and the year of study (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the prevalence of seroma after abdominoplasty is high globally. Therefore, physicians and specialists must consider its importance and take the controlling and treatment measures seriously. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominoplasty; Meta-analysis; Seroma; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34080041     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02365-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  99 in total

1.  Postoperative seromas after abdominoplasty: a retrospective analysis of 494 patients and possible risk factors.

Authors:  A Araco; G Gravante; F Araco; R Sorge; V Cervelli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Abdominoplasty and abdominal wall rehabilitation: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties.

Authors:  K J Stewart; D A Stewart; B Coghlan; D H Harrison; B M Jones; N Waterhouse
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Ultrasound and seromas.

Authors:  I N Stocchero
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Does quilting suture prevent seroma in abdominoplasty?

Authors:  Fabio Xerfan Nahas; Lydia Masako Ferreira; Charles Ghelfond
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Evidence-Based Abdominoplasty Review With Body Contouring Algorithm.

Authors:  Lorne K Rosenfield; Christopher R Davis
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 7.  Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty: a review of 206 cases at a university hospital.

Authors:  Keith C Neaman; Juliana E Hansen
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fluid collection complications following abdominoplasty.

Authors:  J A Mohammad; P H Warnke; W Stavraky
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Plastic surgery after gastric bypass improves long-term quality of life.

Authors:  A Modarressi; N Balagué; O Huber; M Chilcott; B Pittet-Cuénod
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Abdominoplasty in obese and in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  M Murshid; K N Khalid; A Shakir; A Bener
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.