| Literature DB >> 23445542 |
Stephan Wienert1, Daniel Heim, Manato Kotani, Björn Lindequist, Albrecht Stenzinger, Masaru Ishii, Peter Hufnagl, Michael Beil, Manfred Dietel, Carsten Denkert, Frederick Klauschen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Automated image analysis methods are becoming more and more important to extract and quantify image features in microscopy-based biomedical studies and several commercial or open-source tools are available. However, most of the approaches rely on pixel-wise operations, a concept that has limitations when high-level object features and relationships between objects are studied and if user-interactivity on the object-level is desired.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23445542 PMCID: PMC3626931 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Excerpt of the class diagram showing the main data structures used for the object-based imaging: the class summarizes all object-related properties (e.g. classification, contour, features). All objects (of a certain processing step) built an ObjectLayer.
Figure 2Image of Ki67 [18] stained breast cancer tissue displayed in with Ki67+ tumor cells (red), Ki67- tumor cells (yellow) and normal cells (green). Segmentation was performed according to [28]. A. Showing the objects features as a mouse-over effect. B. Scatter plot diagram displaying two features for all image objects (cells) marked in the image on the left: the mean haematoxylin intensity in the H-DAB stain (x-axis) and a form factor given by contour-length2/contour-area (y-axis). The displayed features may be selected by the user once the features are computed (Process menu). A and B. Objects may be selected in the image or in the scatter plot diagram. Selected objects are highlighted in both presentations (blue).
Figure 3The menu of the main application window. This menu is generated on the applications startup: Therefore all available scripts and processing chains are loaded. Users may add own scripts to the respective directory resulting in additional menu entries.
Figure 4User defined cell interaction analysis of a fluorescent bone image with in-program scripting. A. Processing chain with standard elements (e.g. the computation of the length of the objects border to objects classified as bone tissue) and user-defined in-program scripts (e.g. the segmentation and (primary) classification of the three object types bone tissue (blue), osteoclast (green) and monocyte (red)). Names of processing steps are displayed in large black letters, configured arguments in small gray letters. Segmentation result with red, green and blue contours. Interacting cells with yellow contours. B. Source code editor showing the source code of the “Cell Interactions” processing step that computes the length of the border of osteoclasts to bone tissue and assigns the “osteoclast interacting” class if this length is above zero.