Literature DB >> 23444167

Fragile X AGG analysis provides new risk predictions for 45-69 repeat alleles.

Sarah L Nolin1, Sachin Sah, Anne Glicksman, Stephanie L Sherman, Emily Allen, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Flora Tassone, Carolyn Yrigollen, Amy Cronister, Marcia Jodah, Nicole Ersalesi, Carl Dobkin, W Ted Brown, Raghav Shroff, Gary J Latham, Andrew G Hadd.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of AGG interruptions on fragile X repeat instability upon transmission of fragile X intermediate and small premutation alleles with 45-69 CGG repeats. The FMR1 repeat structure was determined for 375 mothers, 48 fathers, and 538 offspring (457 maternal and 81 paternal transmissions) using a novel PCR assay to determine repeat length and AGG interruptions. The number of AGG interruptions and the length of uninterrupted CGG repeats at the 3' end were correlated with repeat instability on transmission. Maternal alleles with no AGGs conferred the greatest risk for unstable transmissions. All nine full mutation expansions were inherited from maternal alleles with no AGGs. Furthermore, the magnitude of repeat expansion was larger for alleles lacking AGG interruptions. Transmissions from paternal alleles with no AGGs also exhibited greater instability than those with one or more AGGs. Our results demonstrate that characterization of the AGG structure within the FMR1 repeat allows more accurate risk estimates of repeat instability and expansion to full mutations for intermediate and small premutation alleles.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23444167      PMCID: PMC4396070          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  25 in total

1.  Preconceptional and prenatal screening for fragile X syndrome: experience with 40,000 tests.

Authors:  Michal Berkenstadt; Liat Ries-Levavi; Howard Cuckle; Leah Peleg; Gad Barkai
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Prevalence of CGG expansions of the FMR1 gene in a US population-based sample.

Authors:  Marsha Mailick Seltzer; Mei Wang Baker; Jinkuk Hong; Matthew Maenner; Jan Greenberg; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.568

3.  Expansion of an FMR1 grey-zone allele to a full mutation in two generations.

Authors:  Isabel Fernandez-Carvajal; Blanca Lopez Posadas; Ruiqin Pan; Christopher Raske; Paul J Hagerman; Flora Tassone
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Fragile X analysis of 1112 prenatal samples from 1991 to 2010.

Authors:  Sarah L Nolin; Anne Glicksman; Xiaohua Ding; Nicole Ersalesi; W Ted Brown; Stephanie L Sherman; Carl Dobkin
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Paternally transmitted FMR1 alleles are less stable than maternally transmitted alleles in the common and intermediate size range.

Authors:  Amy K Sullivan; Dana C Crawford; Elizabeth H Scott; Mary L Leslie; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Fragile X CGG repeat structures among African-Americans: identification of a novel factor responsible for repeat instability.

Authors:  D C Crawford; F Zhang; B Wilson; S T Warren; S L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-07-22       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  A rapid polymerase chain reaction-based screening method for identification of all expanded alleles of the fragile X (FMR1) gene in newborn and high-risk populations.

Authors:  Flora Tassone; Ruiqin Pan; Khaled Amiri; Annette K Taylor; Paul J Hagerman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Prevalence and instability of fragile X alleles: implications for offering fragile X prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Amy Cronister; Jennifer Teicher; Elizabeth M Rohlfs; Alan Donnenfeld; Stephanie Hallam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review.

Authors:  D C Crawford; J M Acuña; S L Sherman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Technical standards and guidelines for fragile X: the first of a series of disease-specific supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics. Quality Assurance Subcommittee of the Laboratory Practice Committee.

Authors:  A Maddalena; C S Richards; M J McGinniss; A Brothman; R J Desnick; R E Grier; B Hirsch; P Jacky; G A McDowell; B Popovich; M Watson; D J Wolff
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Advanced technologies for the molecular diagnosis of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Flora Tassone
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.225

2.  Defining the role of the CGGBP1 protein in FMR1 gene expression.

Authors:  Martina Goracci; Stella Lanni; Giorgia Mancano; Federica Palumbo; Pietro Chiurazzi; Giovanni Neri; Elisabetta Tabolacci
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Longitudinal interviews of couples diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing fragile X premutation testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Logan B Karns; Karen Ventura; Myra L Clark; Richard H Steeves; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Molecular Characterization of FMR1 Gene by TP-PCR in Women of Reproductive Age and Women with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency.

Authors:  Deepika Delsa Dean; Sarita Agarwal; Deepa Kapoor; Kuldeep Singh; Chandra Vati
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Repeat instability during DNA repair: Insights from model systems.

Authors:  Karen Usdin; Nealia C M House; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; Bailey McGuinness; Kamaria Cayton Vaught; Jacqueline Y Maher; William G Kearns
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  A Set of Assays for the Comprehensive Analysis of FMR1 Alleles in the Fragile X-Related Disorders.

Authors:  Bruce E Hayward; Yifan Zhou; Daman Kumari; Karen Usdin
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Improved Assays for AGG Interruptions in Fragile X Premutation Carriers.

Authors:  Bruce E Hayward; Karen Usdin
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 9.  Recent advances in assays for the fragile X-related disorders.

Authors:  Bruce E Hayward; Daman Kumari; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Intermediate CGG repeat length at the FMR1 locus is not associated with hormonal indicators of ovarian age.

Authors:  Jennie K Kline; Ann M Kinney; Bruce Levin; Stephen A Brown; Andrew G Hadd; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.