Literature DB >> 18310361

Prevalence and instability of fragile X alleles: implications for offering fragile X prenatal diagnosis.

Amy Cronister1, Jennifer Teicher, Elizabeth M Rohlfs, Alan Donnenfeld, Stephanie Hallam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document fragile X allele frequencies in a national referral population and evaluate CGG repeat expansion in mother-offspring transmissions.
METHODS: Fragile X DNA analysis by Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction was completed for 14,675 women, aged 18 years or older, and 238 mother-offspring pairs between January 1999 and June 2004. Carrier frequencies were compared between groups referred for different clinical indications. Direct comparison of the FMR1 gene CGG repeat size in mother-offspring pairs determined intermediate and premutation allele stability.
RESULTS: Intermediate fragile X alleles (45-54 CGG repeats) occurred in 257 (1 in 57). The combined total number of patients with a premutation (55-200 CGG repeats) or full mutation (more than 200 CGG repeats) numbered 208 (1 in 71). One in 3.5 women with a family history of fragile X and 1 in 10 with premature ovarian failure had a FMR1 mutation. This compared with 1 in 86 for those with a family history of mental retardation and 1 in 257 for women with no known risk factors for fragile X. Among 238 mother-offspring pairings, the smallest allele to expand to a full mutation in one generation contained 60 CGG repeats. Although 6.6% (4 of 60) of intermediate repeat alleles did expand, none jumped to a clinically significant full mutation-sized allele.
CONCLUSION: Based on these data and other published literature, offering invasive prenatal diagnosis for fragile X syndrome is not indicated for women with intermediate alleles. Invasive prenatal diagnosis is warranted for those women with a fragile X allele containing 55 or more CGG repeats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310361     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163be0b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  33 in total

Review 1.  The impact of FMR1 gene mutations on human reproduction and development: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Noto; Conor Harrity; David Walsh; Kevin Marron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Prevalence of CGG expansions of the FMR1 gene in a US population-based sample.

Authors:  Marsha Mailick Seltzer; Mei Wang Baker; Jinkuk Hong; Matthew Maenner; Jan Greenberg; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.568

3.  FMR1 CGG Repeats: Reference Levels and Race-Ethnic Variation in Women With Normal Fertility (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation).

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Ani Manichaikul; Xin Q Wang; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Molecular Pathophysiology of Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome and Perspectives for Drug Development.

Authors:  Teresa Botta-Orfila; Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Aubin Michalon
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Improving Health Education for Women Who Carry an FMR1 Premutation.

Authors:  Whitney Espinel; Krista Charen; Lillie Huddleston; Jeannie Visootsak; Stephanie Sherman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  At what rate do new premutation alleles arise at the fragile X locus?

Authors:  Diane P Genereux; Charles D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Are expanded alleles of the FMR1 gene related to unexplained recurrent miscarriages?

Authors:  M Fragkos; H Bili; D Ntelios; G Tzimagiorgis; B C Tarlatzis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Fragile X AGG analysis provides new risk predictions for 45-69 repeat alleles.

Authors:  Sarah L Nolin; Sachin Sah; Anne Glicksman; Stephanie L Sherman; Emily Allen; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Flora Tassone; Carolyn Yrigollen; Amy Cronister; Marcia Jodah; Nicole Ersalesi; Carl Dobkin; W Ted Brown; Raghav Shroff; Gary J Latham; Andrew G Hadd
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Intermediate CGG repeat length at the FMR1 locus is not associated with hormonal indicators of ovarian age.

Authors:  Jennie K Kline; Ann M Kinney; Bruce Levin; Stephen A Brown; Andrew G Hadd; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Prenatal screening for fragile x: carriers, controversies, and counseling.

Authors:  Julie F Gutiérrez; Komal Bajaj; Susan D Klugman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.