Literature DB >> 19891049

The Mayo cementless femoral component in active patients with osteoarthritis.

Dietmar Goebel1, Wolfgang Schultz.   

Abstract

This prospective study reports the clinical and radiological results of a single-surgeon series using the Mayo conservative hip stem in a district hospital. 30 total hip arthroplasties were performed in 26 physically active patients. There were 18 women and 8 men, with a mean age of 57.4 years (range 36-79). 4 cases were bilateral. The operation was performed for severe primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hip .Duration of follow-up ranged from 67-87 months (mean 81 months). There were no early complications relating to the surgical procedure. There was one case of traumatic fracture of the femur during rehabilitation,while late complications included two cases of late infection (4 months and 16 months after surgery)both revised in two-stage procedures. There was considerable improvement in Merle d'Aubignescore following surgery. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening, but we identified 2 implants with significant radiolucent lines and subsidence six years after the index operation. Neither patient experienced pain in the hip or restriction of activity. Therefore, the aseptic loosening survival rate was 100%(end point = revision operation). Taking radiological loosening as the end point survivorship was 93.3%.The use of the Mayo short stem component in active patients may preserve bone and enable subsequent revision operations to proceed using primary implants. Our results suggest that conservative designs of this type may be of benefit in selected individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19891049     DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  12 in total

1.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early clinical results of a new conservative hip stem.

Authors:  Jaime J Morales de Cano; Christian Gordo; Jose M Illobre
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-27

Review 3.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Technical considerations and functional results in primary uncemented hip arthroplasty using short femoral stems through mini-invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Moga; M E Pogarasteanu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-09-25

5.  The Mayo conservative hip: complication analysis and management of the first 41 cases performed at a University level 1 department.

Authors:  Jörg Arnholdt; Fabian Gilbert; Marc Blank; Jannis Papazoglou; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth; Andre F Steinert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

7.  Biomechanical Behavior of an Hydroxyapatite-Coated Traditional Hip Stem and a Short One of Similar Design: Comparative Study Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Roces-García; Jesús Moreta; Daniel Donaire-Hoyas; Óscar Gayoso; Fernando Marqués-López; Jorge Albareda
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Comparison of tapered-wedge short and standard-length femoral stems in single-stage bilateral direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vahdet Uçan; Volkan Ezici; Orkhan Aliyev; Gökçer Uzer; İbrahim Tuncay; Fatih Yıldız
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up.

Authors:  Arnaldo Sousa; João Vale; Sara Diniz; Pedro Neves; Joaquim Ramos; Rafaela Coelho
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 10.  Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies.

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Jeroen Molleman; Michel Klaver; Rudolf W Poolman; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.