Literature DB >> 23442264

The effect of regularization in motion compensated PET image reconstruction: a realistic numerical 4D simulation study.

C Tsoumpas1, I Polycarpou, K Thielemans, C Buerger, A P King, T Schaeffter, P K Marsden.   

Abstract

Following continuous improvement in PET spatial resolution, respiratory motion correction has become an important task. Two of the most common approaches that utilize all detected PET events to motion-correct PET data are the reconstruct-transform-average method (RTA) and motion-compensated image reconstruction (MCIR). In RTA, separate images are reconstructed for each respiratory frame, subsequently transformed to one reference frame and finally averaged to produce a motion-corrected image. In MCIR, the projection data from all frames are reconstructed by including motion information in the system matrix so that a motion-corrected image is reconstructed directly. Previous theoretical analyses have explained why MCIR is expected to outperform RTA. It has been suggested that MCIR creates less noise than RTA because the images for each separate respiratory frame will be severely affected by noise. However, recent investigations have shown that in the unregularized case RTA images can have fewer noise artefacts, while MCIR images are more quantitatively accurate but have the common salt-and-pepper noise. In this paper, we perform a realistic numerical 4D simulation study to compare the advantages gained by including regularization within reconstruction for RTA and MCIR, in particular using the median-root-prior incorporated in the ordered subsets maximum a posteriori one-step-late algorithm. In this investigation we have demonstrated that MCIR with proper regularization parameters reconstructs lesions with less bias and root mean square error and similar CNR and standard deviation to regularized RTA. This finding is reproducible for a variety of noise levels (25, 50, 100 million counts), lesion sizes (8 mm, 14 mm diameter) and iterations. Nevertheless, regularized RTA can also be a practical solution for motion compensation as a proper level of regularization reduces both bias and mean square error.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442264     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Data-driven, projection-based respiratory motion compensation of PET data for cardiac PET/CT and PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Martin Lyngby Lassen; Thomas Beyer; Alexander Berger; Dietrich Beitzke; Sazan Rasul; Florian Büther; Marcus Hacker; Jacobo Cal-González
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Judit Lantos; Erik S Mittra; Craig S Levin; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Pulmonary imaging using respiratory motion compensated simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Joyita Dutta; Chuan Huang; Quanzheng Li; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance-based Motion Correction for Quantitative PET in Simultaneous PET-MR Imaging.

Authors:  Yothin Rakvongthai; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2017-07

5.  Data-Driven Gross Patient Motion Detection and Compensation: Implications for Coronary 18F-NaF PET Imaging.

Authors:  Martin Lyngby Lassen; Jacek Kwiecinski; Sebastien Cadet; Damini Dey; Chengjia Wang; Marc R Dweck; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; David E Newby; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Improved quantification for local regions of interest in preclinical PET imaging.

Authors:  J Cal-González; S C Moore; M-A Park; J L Herraiz; J J Vaquero; M Desco; J M Udias
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  List-mode reconstruction for the Biograph mCT with physics modeling and event-by-event motion correction.

Authors:  Xiao Jin; Chung Chan; Tim Mulnix; Vladimir Panin; Michael E Casey; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Irene Polycarpou; Georgios Soultanidis; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Motion-corrected simultaneous cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary MR angiography with high acquisition efficiency.

Authors:  Camila Munoz; Radhouene Neji; Gastão Cruz; Andrew Mallia; Sami Jeljeli; Andrew J Reader; Rene M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Respiratory motion correction of PET using MR-constrained PET-PET registration.

Authors:  Daniel R Balfour; Paul K Marsden; Irene Polycarpou; Christoph Kolbitsch; Andrew P King
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.