| Literature DB >> 23442259 |
Zuozhang Yang1, Yu Zhang, Da Xu, Giulio Maccauro, Barbara Rossi, Hua Jiang, Jiaping Wang, Hongpu Sun, Lei Xu, Yanjin Chen, Xuefeng Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although brachytherapy is one of the most effective ways to treat metastatic spinal tumor with little damage to surrounding healthy tissue, it may cause radiation myelopathy if an overdose occurs. Establishing a valuable animal model can help to find a method to overcome its complications. In the current study, we set up a banna mini-pig model to mimic percutaneous vertebroplasty with 125I seed implantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23442259 PMCID: PMC3598515 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Figure 1Three-dimensional schematic pictures of the T13 level of the spine in banna mini-pig.
Figure 2Position in the vertebral body of PVP with the I implant.
Figure 3DSA scan during the operation and postoperation. (A) During the operation, seeds were injected into the T13 level of the spine in banna mini-pigs. (B) Seeds were implanted into the target region postoperation.
Figure 4CT scan to confirm the good distribution of bone cement and seeds in the T13 level of swine spine. (A) and (B) are CT scan pictures. (C) is a three-dimensional schema chart of swine spine with PVP and seed implant.
The parameters of the three dimensions of the vertebral body and the total radiation dose for the T13 level
| 0.39 | 1.03 | 1 | 1 | 0.50 | 1161.38 | 1014.4 ± 86.9 |
| 0.38 | 1.03 | 1 | 1 | 0.48 | 1035.14 | |
| 0.39 | 1.05 | 1 | 1 | 0.48 | 894.77 | |
| 0.41 | 1.03 | 1 | 1 | 0.52 | 978.49 | |
| 0.40 | 1.04 | 1 | 1 | 0.50 | 1004.24 | |
| 0.44 | 1.07 | 1 | 1 | 0.52 | 1012.38 |
Note: means the average dose that the vertebral body received in the eight months. A, particle initial radiation dose; D, total received dose; D(0), initial dose, F, anisotropy constant; g(r), radial dose functions; r, distance between the spinal surface to the 125I particles; T, time interval.
Hematological index comparison between preimplantation and postimplantation
| Preoperation | 6 | 13.85 ± 2.09 | _ | 140.06 ± 5.92 | _ | 451.83 ± 14.04 | _ | 98.82 ± 6.35 | _ |
| After 1 week | 6 | 12.96 ± 1.31 | 0.432 | 141.80 ± 4.39 | 0.645 | 449.39 ± 16.01 | 0.432 | 99.53 ± 7.20 | 0.213 |
| After 1 month | 6 | 13.44 ± 2.12 | 0.523 | 140.59 ± 6.01 | 0.724 | 450.13 ± 16.70 | 0.223 | 98.75 ± 7.32 | 0.536 |
| After 2 months | 6 | 13.75 ± 2.02 | 0.642 | 141.40 ± 4.19 | 0.542 | 451.35 ± 14.59 | 0.745 | 97.69 ± 8.49 | 0.242 |
| After 8 months | 6 | 13.77 ± 1.72 | 0.589 | 140.98 ± 5.67 | 0.675 | 450.59 ± 15.22 | 0.472 | 97.87 ± 7.28 | 0.646 |
Note: All P values were compared with preoperation data.
Figure 5The pathological analysis of the vertebral body. (A) is the photograph of the half spine cut from the middle; (B) and (C) are H & E ×100 pictures, the bone cement distribution is shown; (D) and (E) were H & E stained with ×400 and ×2400 pictures, showing that the bone microstructure and bone cells keep their normal shape, no necrosis was noted.
Figure 6H & E ×200 pictures for spinal cord cells. No significant structural alteration was found.
Figure 7Electron microscopy observations.