| Literature DB >> 22390740 |
Zuozhang Yang1, Yongqing Xu, Dakuan Yang, Hongpu Sun, Ruilian Zhao, Jin Zhang, Xiaoxue Wang, Hua Jiang, Lie Xu, Jinlei Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use a banna mini-pig to set up 125I implantation model, and investigate the consequence of radiation-related impairments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22390740 PMCID: PMC3312839 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Figure 13D schematic pictures of T13 level of spine in banna mini-pig.
Figure 2.
Figure 3DSA scan of in-process-operation and post-operation. A) process of operation, seeds were injecting into T13 level of spine in banna pigs; B) seeds were implanted into target region post-operation.
Figure 4A) and B) are CT scanning to confirm the location of seeds in T13 level of swine spine; C) is typical isodose and seeds distribution displayed in the cross section CT slices for some individual pig obtained by TPS system.
the parameters of the three dimension of spinal canal and total radiation dose for T13 level
| Animals | A (mCi) | Λ | Fan angle | Pitch angle | r | g(r) | f (rq) | Dose rate | D(4T1/2) | ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 64.2 | 162.4 | 0.79 | 1.039 | 1 | 0.91 | 1752.86 | |
| 2 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 64.2 | 162.4 | 0.8 | 1.039 | 1 | 0.89 | 1986.84 | |
| 3 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 65.6 | 160.1 | 0.8 | 1.039 | 1 | 0.89 | 1680.38 | |
| 4 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 64.5 | 162.4 | 0.74 | 1.039 | 1 | 1.04 | 1972.58 | 1853 ± 142.89 |
| 5 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 65 | 161.8 | 0.77 | 1.039 | 1 | 0.96 | 1986.52 | |
| 6 | 1.27 | 1.06 | 63.1 | 164.1 | 0.78 | 1.039 | 1 | 0.93 | 1742.41 |
means average dose which vertebral body received in the 8 months.
hematological index comparison between pre-implantation and post-implantation
| Time | N | White cell (X109/L) | hemoglobin(g/L) | platelet (X109/L) | creatinine (μmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-operation | 6 | 14.23 ± 2.12 | _ | 143.12 ± 4.89 | _ | 452.22 ± 13.06 | _ | 97.71 ± 8.26 | _ |
| 1 week post implant | 6 | 13.63 ± 1.23 | 0.475 | 142.83 ± 4.58 | 0.412 | 450.30 ± 16.32 | 0.327 | 98.65 ± 7.64 | 0.263 |
| One month post implant | 6 | 13.85 ± 2.35 | 0.436 | 141.57 ± 6.12 | 0.567 | 448.12 ± 17.02 | 0.461 | 99.01 ± 7.24 | 0.346 |
| Two months post implant | 6 | 13.84 ± 2.30 | 0.542 | 141.57 ± 4.69 | 0.523 | 451.98 ± 15.01 | 0.652 | 98.97 ± 7.97 | 0.452 |
| 8 months post implant | 6 | 13.697 ± 1.83 | 0.456 | 141.79 ± 5.78 | 0.435 | 451.57 ± 16.28 | 0.493 | 97.05 ± 8.39 | 0.462 |
All P value was compared with pre-operation data.
Figure 5the pathological analysis of spinal canal. A) Necrosis region in spinal canal; B) and C) Inflammatory cell invading vessels, HE × 200 and HE × 400 respectively. D) and E) Phagocytosis of neurons, HE stain with × 200 and × 400. F) Demyelination, HE × 200.
Figure 6Electron-microscopic observation A) Axon shrinkage and appearance of apoptotic body; B) Autophagy response; C) and D) shrinkage and swelling of neuron cells; E) Organelles' structure was unclear, mitochondria swelled, nerve fiber dissolved.