Literature DB >> 7623532

Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient's record.

C Safran1, D M Rind, R B Davis, D Ives, D Z Sands, J Currier, W V Slack, H J Makadon, D J Cotton.   

Abstract

Computers are steadily being incorporated in clinical practice. We conducted a nonrandomised, controlled, prospective trial of electronic messages designed to enhance adherence to clinical practice guidelines. We studied 126 physicians and nurse practitioners who used electronic medical records when caring for 349 patients with HIV infection in a primary care practice. We analysed the response times of clinicians to the situations that triggered alerts and reminders, the number of ambulatory visits, and hospitalisation. The median response times to 303 alerts in the intervention group and 388 alerts in the control group were 11 and 52 days (p < 0.0001), respectively. The median response time to 432 reminders in the intervention group was 114 days and that for 360 reminders in the control group was over 500 days (p < 0.0001). There was no effect on visits to the primary care practice. There was, however, a significant increase in the rate of visits outside the primary care practice (p = 0.02), which is explained by the increased frequency of visits to ophthalmologists. There were no differences in admission rates (p = 0.47), in admissions for pneumocystosis (p = 0.09), in visits to the emergency ward (p = 0.24), or in survival (p = 0.19). We conclude that the electronic medical record was effective in helping clinicians adhere to practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623532     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92226-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  44 in total

1.  The transition to automated practitioner order entry in a teaching hospital: the VA Puget Sound experience.

Authors:  T H Payne
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Incorporating preventive care recommendations into clinical practice: how do we bridge the gap?

Authors:  J D Douketis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

5.  Do practice guidelines augment drug utilisation review?

Authors:  E A Chrischilles; K Gondek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Clinicians, educators, and investigators in general internal medicine: bridging the gaps.

Authors:  Kenneth J Mukamal; Gerald W Smetana; Tom Delbanco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  An information system and medical record to support HIV treatment in rural Haiti.

Authors:  Hamish S F Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Patrice Nevil; Yusuf Karacaoglu; Paul E Farmer; Evan Lyon; Mary Kay C Smith Fawzi; Fernet Leandre; Sharon S Choi; Joia S Mukherjee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-13

9.  Vocabulary requirements for implementing clinical guidelines in an electronic medical record: a case study.

Authors:  Frank A Sonnenberg; C Greg Hagerty; Janaki Acharya; David S Pickens; Casimir A Kulikowski
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

10.  Integrating incident reporting into an electronic patient record system.

Authors:  Guy Haller; Paul S Myles; Johannes Stoelwinder; Mark Langley; Hugh Anderson; John McNeil
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.