Literature DB >> 2343977

Isokinetic evaluation of shoulder rotational strength between the plane of scapula and the frontal plane.

B H Greenfield1, R Donatelli, M J Wooden, J Wilkes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether shoulder rotational strength was greater in the plane of the scapula or the frontal plane. Isokinetic shoulder rotational strength was evaluated in 20 subjects. Using the Merac (Universal Gym Equipment, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA), test data was gathered in the right shoulders, in 45 degrees abduction, at a speed of 60 deg/sec, in the plane of the scapula and the frontal plane. Each subject returned within 1 week for retests to establish reliability. The average correlational coefficient across tests was 0.87. The Merac computer system was used to analyze data. Mean and standard deviations for peak torque to body weight were calculated. A paired t-test was used to examine the difference in the means for internal and external rotation between the two positions. The results indicated no significant difference between the two positions for shoulder internal rotational strength values. However, shoulder external rotational strength values in the plane of the scapula were statistically significantly higher than in the frontal plane (P less than 0.001). These preliminary results suggest isokinetic strength training and testing may be preferable in the plane of the scapula rather than the frontal plane.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2343977     DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  The application of isokinetics in testing and rehabilitation of the shoulder complex.

Authors:  T S Ellenbecker; G J Davies
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Rotation-abduction analysis in 10 normal and 20 pathologic shoulders. Elite system application.

Authors:  J L Leroux; J P Micallef; F Bonnel; F Blotman
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Limitations of isokinetic testing to determine shoulder strength after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  David Yen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

4.  Suprascapular neuropathy in volleyball players.

Authors:  E Witvrouw; A Cools; R Lysens; D Cambier; G Vanderstraeten; J Victor; C Sneyers; M Walravens
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Objective assessment of shoulder mobility with a new 3D gyroscope--a validation study.

Authors:  Bilal Farouk El-Zayat; Turgay Efe; Annett Heidrich; Udo Wolf; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Stefan Lakemeier; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Experimentally quantifying the feasible torque space of the human shoulder.

Authors:  Emma M Baillargeon; Daniel Ludvig; M Hongchul Sohn; Constantine P Nicolozakes; Amee L Seitz; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  A comparison of whole-body vibration and resistance training on total work in the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Jason Hand; Susan Verscheure; Louis Osternig
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Selective activation of the infraspinatus muscle.

Authors:  Sung-Min Ha; Oh-Yun Kwon; Heon-Seock Cynn; Won-Hwee Lee; Su-Jung Kim; Kyue-Nam Park
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Are shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis strong enough? A pilot study.

Authors:  Tjarco D W Alta; H E J Veeger; Thomas W J Janssen; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope.

Authors:  Bilal Farouk El-Zayat; Turgay Efe; Annett Heidrich; Robert Anetsmann; Nina Timmesfeld; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus Dietmar Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.