BACKGROUND: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for clinical follow-up of shoulder treatment. Only a few high sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The interobserver dependency of conventional goniometer measurements is high. In the 1990s an isokinetic measuring system of BIODEX Inc. was introduced, which is a very complex but valid instrument. Since 2008 a new user-friendly system called DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) is available. Aim of this study is the validation of this measuring instrument using the BIODEX-System. METHODS: The BIODEX is a computerized robotic dynamometer used for isokinetic testing and training of athletes. Because of its size the system needs to be installed in a separated room. The DP is a small, light-weighted three-dimensional gyroscope that is fixed on the distal upper patient arm, recording abduction, flexion and rotation. For direct comparison we fixed the DP on the lever arm of the BIODEX. The accuracy of measurement was determined at different positions, angles and distances from the centre of rotation (COR) as well as different velocities in a radius between 0° - 180° in steps of 20°. All measurements were repeated 10 times. As satisfactory accuracy a difference between both systems below 5° was defined. The statistical analysis was performed with a linear regression model. RESULTS: The evaluation shows very high accuracy of measurements. The maximum average deviation is below 2.1°. For a small range of motion the DP is slightly underestimating comparing the BIODEX, whereas for higher angles increasing positive differences are observed. The distance to the COR as well as the position of the DP on the lever arm have no significant influence. Concerning different motion speeds significant but not relevant influence is detected. Unfortunately device related effects are observed, leading to differences between repeated measurements with any two different devices up to 8° at maximal range of motion (180°). CONCLUSIONS: In summary the results shows high correlation and good reproducibility of measurements. All deviations are inside the tolerance interval of 5°, if one device is used. An unlikely systematic device effect is detected. These laboratory trials are promising for the validation of this system in humans. The challenge for both systems will be the changing of the COR in the shoulder joint at elevations higher than 90°.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for clinical follow-up of shoulder treatment. Only a few high sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The interobserver dependency of conventional goniometer measurements is high. In the 1990s an isokinetic measuring system of BIODEX Inc. was introduced, which is a very complex but valid instrument. Since 2008 a new user-friendly system called DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) is available. Aim of this study is the validation of this measuring instrument using the BIODEX-System. METHODS: The BIODEX is a computerized robotic dynamometer used for isokinetic testing and training of athletes. Because of its size the system needs to be installed in a separated room. The DP is a small, light-weighted three-dimensional gyroscope that is fixed on the distal upper patient arm, recording abduction, flexion and rotation. For direct comparison we fixed the DP on the lever arm of the BIODEX. The accuracy of measurement was determined at different positions, angles and distances from the centre of rotation (COR) as well as different velocities in a radius between 0° - 180° in steps of 20°. All measurements were repeated 10 times. As satisfactory accuracy a difference between both systems below 5° was defined. The statistical analysis was performed with a linear regression model. RESULTS: The evaluation shows very high accuracy of measurements. The maximum average deviation is below 2.1°. For a small range of motion the DP is slightly underestimating comparing the BIODEX, whereas for higher angles increasing positive differences are observed. The distance to the COR as well as the position of the DP on the lever arm have no significant influence. Concerning different motion speeds significant but not relevant influence is detected. Unfortunately device related effects are observed, leading to differences between repeated measurements with any two different devices up to 8° at maximal range of motion (180°). CONCLUSIONS: In summary the results shows high correlation and good reproducibility of measurements. All deviations are inside the tolerance interval of 5°, if one device is used. An unlikely systematic device effect is detected. These laboratory trials are promising for the validation of this system in humans. The challenge for both systems will be the changing of the COR in the shoulder joint at elevations higher than 90°.
Authors: Joshua M Drouin; Tamara C Valovich-mcLeod; Sandra J Shultz; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Vincent T Van Hees; Sander M Slootmaker; Gert De Groot; Willem Van Mechelen; Rob C Van Lummel Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Andrea F de Winter; Monique A M B Heemskerk; Caroline B Terwee; Marielle P Jans; Walter Devillé; Dirk-Jan van Schaardenburg; Rob J P M Scholten; Lex M Bouter Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Kate McGirr; Stine Ibsen Harring; Thomas Sean Risager Kennedy; Morten Frederik Schuster Pedersen; Rogerio Pessoto Hirata; Kristian Thorborg; Thomas Bandholm; Michael Skovdal Rathleff Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2015-06
Authors: Kaitlyn R Ammann; Touhid Ahamed; Alice L Sweedo; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Yonatan E Weiner; Rebecca C Slepian; Hongki Jo; Marvin J Slepian Journal: BMC Biomed Eng Date: 2020-02-27
Authors: Frank A Petrigliano; Per Henrik Borgstrom; William J Kaiser; David R McAllister; Keith L Markolf Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Ludo I F Penning; Nick A Guldemond; Rob A de Bie; Geert H I M Walenkamp Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 2.362