Literature DB >> 23439346

A comparison of strength and stretch interventions on active and passive ranges of movement in dancers: a randomized controlled trial.

Matthew A Wyon1, Anna Smith, Yiannis Koutedakis.   

Abstract

The majority of stretching interventional research has focused on the development of a muscle's passive range of movement (PROM). Active range of movement (AROM) refers to the functional range of movement (ROM) available to the participant and provides a better insight into the relationship between muscular antagonistic pairings. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 3 strengthening or stretching interventions on hip and lower limb active (AROM) and passive (PROM) ranges of movement. Thirty-nine female dance students (17 ± 0.52 years; 61.7 ± 8.48 kg; 164.4 ± 5.49 cm) volunteered. They were randomly divided into 3 groups, strength training (n = 11); low-intensity stretching (n = 13); moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretching (n = 11). Four dancers withdrew during the study. All groups carried out a 6-week intervention. The strength training group focused on end of range hip flexor strength; the low-intensity and moderate-intensity stretch group carried out a series of stretches at 3/10 and 8/10 perceived exertion, respectively. Active range of movement and PROM were measured preintervention and postintervention using 2-d video analysis. Repeated measures analysis indicated that although all 3 groups improved their PROM during the experimental period (range increase: 9-200 p < 0.01), no significant differences were found between the groups. For AROM, both the strength training and the low-intensity stretch groups revealed significant improvements in ROM (range increase: 20-300) compared with the moderate-intensity or high-intensity stretch group (p < 0.01). The present data show that interventions based on strengthening agonist muscles or decreasing the resistance of antagonist muscles through low-intensity stretching are beneficial in the development of both active and passive ranges of movement and provide functional training techniques that are often over looked in favor of the more conservative moderate-intensity stretching programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23439346     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828a4842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  The acute benefits and risks of passive stretching to the point of pain.

Authors:  Pornpimol Muanjai; David A Jones; Mantas Mickevicius; Danguole Satkunskiene; Audrius Snieckus; Albertas Skurvydas; Sigitas Kamandulis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effects of 4 weeks stretching training to the point of pain on flexibility and muscle tendon unit properties.

Authors:  Pornpimol Muanjai; David A Jones; Mantas Mickevicius; Danguole Satkunskiene; Audrius Snieckus; Renata Rutkauskaite; Dalia Mickeviciene; Sigitas Kamandulis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility.

Authors:  Taizan Fukaya; Shingo Matsuo; Masahiro Iwata; Eiji Yamanaka; Wakako Tsuchida; Yuji Asai; Shigeyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  THE EFFECT OF A RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS-BASED POWER-FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM ON THE LOWER LIMB FLEXIBILITY AND POWER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCERS.

Authors:  Lauren Skopal; Kevin Netto; Brad Aisbett; Amir Takla; Troy Castricum
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-05

5.  Acute effects of anterior thigh foam rolling on hip angle, knee angle, and rectus femoris length in the modified Thomas test.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Gregory J Lehman; Bret Contreras; Chris Beardsley; Bryan Chung; Erin H Feser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Effectiveness of stretching and bracing for the treatment of osteoarthritis-associated joint contractures prior to joint replacement: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  T Mark Campbell; Bahareh Bahram Ghaedi; Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu; Marie Westby; Vivian A Welch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Flexibility of Ballet Dancers in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Observational Study in Portugal.

Authors:  Amanda Batista; Elmiro Neto; Luís Branquinho; Ricardo Ferraz; Joana Ribeiro; Pedro Forte; Lurdes Ávila-Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  The relevance of stretch intensity and position-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikos Apostolopoulos; George S Metsios; Andreas D Flouris; Yiannis Koutedakis; Matthew A Wyon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-18

9.  Comparison of Two Static Stretching Procedures on Hip Adductor Flexibility and Strength.

Authors:  Brandon M Fjerstad; Roger L Hammer; Adam M Hammer; Gavin Connolly; Karen V Lomond; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-10-01

10.  Ecological and Construct Validity of a New Technical Level Cuban Dance Field Test.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Alin Larion; Olfa Turki; Ionel Melenco; Cristian Popa; Stefano Palermi; Gian Mario Migliaccio; Stefania Mannarini; Alessandro Alberto Rossi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.