Lauren Skopal1, Kevin Netto2, Brad Aisbett3, Amir Takla, Troy Castricum1. 1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia. 2. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia. 3. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing cross-fertilization between the movements in contemporary dance and aesthetic sports such as rhythmic gymnastics. In such sports, supplementary training is commonly used to enable athletes to achieve all of their training goals, however dancers typically do not engage in cross training from other disciplines. PURPOSE: The aim of this research was to test the effectiveness of a rhythmic gymnastics-based supplementary training program on lower limb flexibility and power of contemporary dancers. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study using a between-groups design. SETTING: Training Intervention: Prahran Rhythmic Gymnastics Specialist Centre, Testing: Deakin University. METHODS: Eleven female contemporary dancers were randomly assigned to either a control or intervention group. The intervention group (n = 6) participated in an eight-week rhythmic gymnastics-based supplementary training program comprising two one-hour sessions per week in addition to their usual training. The control group (n = 5) continued their usual dance training. Pre and post measures of range of motion (ROM) and power were taken via a dance-specific kick test using an isokinetic dynamometer and a customized grand jeté test in a 3D-motion laboratory. RESULTS: Significant increases in right and left leg grand jeté ROM, right leg peak kicking torque and left leg grand jeté height were recorded in the intervention compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that rhythmic gymnastics training could provide a viable means for contemporary dancers to target active ROM and power of explosive dance movements. Future research should include subjective evaluations of dance performers to confirm that training adaptions are transferred to improvements in performance quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing cross-fertilization between the movements in contemporary dance and aesthetic sports such as rhythmic gymnastics. In such sports, supplementary training is commonly used to enable athletes to achieve all of their training goals, however dancers typically do not engage in cross training from other disciplines. PURPOSE: The aim of this research was to test the effectiveness of a rhythmic gymnastics-based supplementary training program on lower limb flexibility and power of contemporary dancers. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study using a between-groups design. SETTING: Training Intervention: Prahran Rhythmic Gymnastics Specialist Centre, Testing: Deakin University. METHODS: Eleven female contemporary dancers were randomly assigned to either a control or intervention group. The intervention group (n = 6) participated in an eight-week rhythmic gymnastics-based supplementary training program comprising two one-hour sessions per week in addition to their usual training. The control group (n = 5) continued their usual dance training. Pre and post measures of range of motion (ROM) and power were taken via a dance-specific kick test using an isokinetic dynamometer and a customized grand jeté test in a 3D-motion laboratory. RESULTS: Significant increases in right and left leg grand jeté ROM, right leg peak kicking torque and left leg grand jeté height were recorded in the intervention compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that rhythmic gymnastics training could provide a viable means for contemporary dancers to target active ROM and power of explosive dance movements. Future research should include subjective evaluations of dance performers to confirm that training adaptions are transferred to improvements in performance quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Alessandra Di Cagno; Carlo Baldari; Claudia Battaglia; Maria Dolores Monteiro; Alessandra Pappalardo; Marina Piazza; Laura Guidetti Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Laura Guidetti; Alessandra Di Cagno; Maria Chiara Gallotta; Claudia Battaglia; Marina Piazza; Carlo Baldari Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.775