Literature DB >> 22968080

Breast cancer molecular phenotype and the use of HER2-targeted agents influence the accuracy of breast MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Hyeong-Gon Moon1, Wonshik Han, Soo Kyung Ahn, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, Seock-Ah Im, In Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is affected by molecular features of primary breast cancer and the use of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents.
BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of factors affecting the accuracy of breast MRI after NST can lead to more tailored use of MRI in deciding surgical extent after NST.
METHODS: We analyzed the imaging and clinicopathological data of 463 patients who underwent NST. We aimed to investigate whether the molecular subtypes, and the use of targeted therapies, were associated with changes in the accuracy of MRI predicting residual tumor extent.
RESULTS: The accuracy of MRI predicting the residual tumor extent was most accurate in triple-negative breast cancer and was least accurate in Luminal A subtype (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.754 and 0.531, respectively). Multivariate analysis suggested estrogen receptor (ER) status as an independent factor influencing the MRI accuracy. In HER2-amplified tumors, the use of HER2-targeted agents was associated with a less accurate MRI prediction.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of MRI in predicting residual tumor extent was lowest in ER-positive tumors treated with NST. In HER2-positive tumors, the use of HER2-targeted agents resulted in a less accurate MRI after NST. These factors should be considered for deciding the extent of breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22968080     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686bd9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.

Authors:  Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Performance of Mid-Treatment Breast Ultrasound and Axillary Ultrasound in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Breast Cancer Subtype.

Authors:  Rosalind P Candelaria; Roland L Bassett; William Fraser Symmans; Maheshwari Ramineni; Stacy L Moulder; Henry M Kuerer; Alastair M Thompson; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-03-17

3.  Prediction of pathologic complete response on MRI in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Jieun Kim; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Ji Soo Choi; Ko Woon Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Impact of factors affecting the residual tumor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Peter T Fwu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Accurately Discriminate between No Residual Carcinoma and Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seho Park; Jung Hyun Yoon; Joohyuk Sohn; Hyung Seok Park; Hee Jung Moon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of MRI accuracy after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer patients considering tumor biology: optimizing the surgical planning.

Authors:  Alberto Bouzón; Ángela Iglesias; Benigno Acea; Cristina Mosquera; Paz Santiago; Joaquín Mosquera
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Prognostic and predictive significance of MYC and KRAS alterations in breast cancer from women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Cynthia Brito Lins Pereira; Mariana Ferreira Leal; Carolina Rosal Teixeira de Souza; Raquel Carvalho Montenegro; Juan Antonio Rey; Antônio Alberto Carvalho; Paulo Pimentel Assumpção; André Salim Khayat; Giovanny Rebouças Pinto; Sâmia Demachki; Marília de Arruda Cardoso Smith; Rommel Rodríguez Burbano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to evaluate tumour response and residual tumour size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alberto Bouzón; Benigno Acea; Rafaela Soler; Ángela Iglesias; Paz Santiago; Joaquín Mosquera; Lourdes Calvo; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Alejandra García
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  An objective nodal staging system for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment.

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo; Jung Min Chang; Hee-Chul Shin; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Hyeong-Gon Moon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Hee Jeong Kim; Woo Chul Noh; Eun Sook Lee; Yong Sik Jung; Lee Su Kim; Wonshik Han; Seok Jin Nam; Gyung -Yub Gong; Hwa Jung Kim; Sei Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.