Literature DB >> 24905285

Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus.

Sarah Shultz1, Gregory McCarthy2.   

Abstract

While decades of research have demonstrated that a region of the right fusiform gyrus (FG) responds selectively to faces, a second line of research suggests that the FG responds to a range of animacy cues, including biological motion and goal-directed actions, even in the absence of faces or other human-like surface features. These findings raise the question of whether the FG is indeed sensitive to faces or to the more abstract category of animate agents. The current study uses fMRI to examine whether the FG responds to all faces in a category-specific way or whether the FG is especially sensitive to the faces of animate agents. Animate agents are defined here as intentional agents with the capacity for rational goal-directed actions. Specifically, we examine how the FG responds to an entity that looks like an animate agent but that lacks the capacity for goal-directed rational action. Region-of-interest analyses reveal that the FG activates more strongly to the animate compared with the inanimate entity, even though the surface features of both animate and inanimate entities were identical. These results suggest that the FG does not respond to all faces in a category-specific way, and is instead especially sensitive to whether an entity is animate.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animacy detection; Face processing; Fusiform; Goal-directed actions; Posterior superior temporal sulcus; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24905285      PMCID: PMC4322763          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  23 in total

1.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  J Sergent; S Ohta; B MacDonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Ruth M Schmitt; Stephanie Spengler; György Gergely
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Understanding animate agents: distinct roles for the social network and mirror system.

Authors:  Thalia Wheatley; Shawn C Milleville; Alex Martin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

4.  Stimulus-induced reversal of information flow through a cortical network for animacy perception.

Authors:  Sarah Shultz; Rebecca N van den Honert; Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns.

Authors:  F Castelli; F Happé; U Frith; C Frith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of 'pure reason' in infancy.

Authors:  G Csibra; G Gergely; S Bíró; O Koós; M Brockbank
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-10-26

9.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations.

Authors:  J V Haxby; B Horwitz; L G Ungerleider; J M Maisog; P Pietrini; C L Grady
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI.

Authors:  A Puce; T Allison; J C Gore; G McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  9 in total

1.  Whole-agent selectivity within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Clark Fisher; Winrich A Freiwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Looming Threats and Animacy: Reduced Responsiveness in Youth with Disrupted Behavior Disorders.

Authors:  Stuart F White; Laura C Thornton; Joseph Leshin; Roberta Clanton; Stephen Sinclair; Dionne Coker-Appiah; Harma Meffert; Soonjo Hwang; James R Blair
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2018-05

3.  Perceived live interaction modulates the developing social brain.

Authors:  Katherine Rice; Dustin Moraczewski; Elizabeth Redcay
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The attribution of animacy and agency in frontotemporal dementia versus Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sylvia S Fong; Pongsatorn Paholpak; Madelaine Daianu; Mariel B Deutsch; Brandalyn C Riedel; Andrew R Carr; Elvira E Jimenez; Michelle M Mather; Paul M Thompson; Mario F Mendez
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Specificity, reliability and sensitivity of social brain responses during spontaneous mentalizing.

Authors:  Carolin Moessnang; Axel Schäfer; Edda Bilek; Paul Roux; Kristina Otto; Sarah Baumeister; Sarah Hohmann; Luise Poustka; Daniel Brandeis; Tobias Banaschewski; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Heike Tost
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Neural Patterns are More Similar across Individuals during Successful Memory Encoding than during Failed Memory Encoding.

Authors:  Griffin E Koch; John P Paulus; Marc N Coutanche
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Differential effects of face-realism and emotion on event-related brain potentials and their implications for the uncanny valley theory.

Authors:  Sebastian Schindler; Eduard Zell; Mario Botsch; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Face shape processing via visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates regions within the face processing networks in the absence of visual experience.

Authors:  Roni Arbel; Benedetta Heimler; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  How Well Do Computer-Generated Faces Tap Face Expertise?

Authors:  Kate Crookes; Louise Ewing; Ju-Dith Gildenhuys; Nadine Kloth; William G Hayward; Matt Oxner; Stephen Pond; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.