Literature DB >> 24671634

[Femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery depending on interface design and laser pulse energy: results of the first 200 cases].

W J Mayer1, O K Klaproth, M Ostovic, F H Hengerer, T Kohnen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery depending on interface design and laser pulse energy settings.
METHODS: In this non-randomized, consecutive case series200 eyes underwent femtosecond laser-assisted (LenSx, Alcon) lens surgery between November 2012 and June 2013. Group 1 consisted of 85 eyes with 60 cataracts and 25 refractive lens exchanges (RLE) which were treated with a curved direct contact interface, and group 2 consisting of 115 eyes with 72 cataracts and 43 RLEs treated with a modified interface using an additional soft contact lens (SoftFit™, Alcon) between the corneal surface and the interface. The degree of opacity of the lens in cataract eyes was measured with a Scheimpflug camera. Afterwards, phacoemulsification was performed with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in all eyes. Primary endpoints were the effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), the average laser treatment time and the occurrence of intraoperative complications.
RESULTS: The mean EPT in group 1 was 1.62 ± 1.12 s (cataract 1.94 ± 1.31 s, RLE 1.29 ± 1.01 s) and in group 2 the mean EPT was 1.66 ± 0.92 s (cataract 1.98 ± 1.28 s, RLE 1.33 ± 1.22 s, p = 0.32 between groups). The laser treatment lasted on average 48.90 ± 2.45 s (group 1) and 49.70 ± 2.87 s (group 2) with an average lens fragmentation thickness of 3401.48 ± 401.12 µm (all groups). In four cases of group 1, a second applanation of the interface was necessary. Furthermore, one anterior capsule tear, 39 cases of intraoperative wrinkling of the corneal surface and 21 cases in which the corneal incision had to be opened manually were documented in group 1. In group 2 no second applanation of the interface, no anterior capsule tears and no corneal wrinkling but 9 cases with a manual opening of corneal incisions were documented (p < 0.01 between groups).
CONCLUSION: The minor intraoperative complications of the femtosecond laser technique investigated could be significantly reduced using an optimized interface and reduced laser pulse energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671634     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-014-3043-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  20 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in management of phacomorphic glaucoma.

Authors:  Kinga Kránitz; Agnes Ildikó Takács; Andrea Gyenes; Tamás Filkorn; Róbert Gergely; Illés Kovács; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  On the way to zero phaco.

Authors:  H Burkhard Dick; Tim Schultz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of rigid curved interface femtosecond laser-assisted and manual anterior capsulotomy.

Authors:  Marko Ostovic; Oliver K Klaproth; Fritz H Hengerer; Wolfgang J Mayer; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Early experience with the femtosecond laser for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Shveta Jindal Bali; Chris Hodge; Michael Lawless; Timothy V Roberts; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Intraocular pressure during femtosecond laser pretreatment of cataract.

Authors:  Nathan M Kerr; Robin G Abell; Brendan J Vote; Tze 'Yo Toh
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Comparison of macular morphology between femtosecond laser-assisted and traditional cataract surgery.

Authors:  Jenny L Lauschke; Shahriar Amjadi; Oliver C F Lau; Richard T Parker; Jeanie Chui; Sai Win; Benjamin W C Sim; Janice J Y Ku; Chris H L Lim; Ravjit Singh; Ashima Aggarwala; Michael C Wei; Geoffrey S Cohn; Derek G Chan; Phillip A Armstrong; Ashish Agar; Ian C Francis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Interface for femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Phakic intraocular lenses part 1: historical overview, current models, selection criteria, and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Jose Luis Güell; Merce Morral; Daniel Kook; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Effect of femtosecond laser fragmentation on effective phacoemulsification time in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ina Conrad-Hengerer; Fritz H Hengerer; Tim Schultz; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment.

Authors:  Robin G Abell; Nathan M Kerr; Brendan J Vote
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Technology in Refractive Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  João Saraiva; Kristin Neatrour; George O Waring Iv
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 2.  Update and clinical utility of the LenSx femtosecond laser in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Timothy V Roberts; Michael Lawless; Gerard Sutton; Chris Hodge
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.