Literature DB >> 23433811

Checkpoint protein Rad9 plays an important role in nucleotide excision repair.

Tiepeng Li1, Zhixin Wang, Yun Zhao, Wei He, Lili An, Shengquan Liu, Yuheng Liu, Hailin Wang, Haiying Hang.   

Abstract

Rad9, an evolutionarily conserved checkpoint gene with multiple functions for preserving genomic integrity, has been shown to play important roles in homologous recombination repair, base excision repair and mismatch repair. However, whether Rad9 has an impact on nucleotide excision repair remains unknown. Here we demonstrated that Rad9 was involved in nucleotide excision repair and loss of Rad9 led to defective removal of the UV-derived photoproduct 6-4PP (6,4 pyrimidine-pyrimidone) and the BPDE (anti-benzo(a)pyrene-trans-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide)-DNA adducts in mammalian cells. We also demonstrated that Rad9 could co-localize with XPC in response to local UV irradiation. However, our data showed that Rad9 was not required for the photoproducts recognition step of nucleotide excision repair. Further investigation revealed that reduction of Rad9 reduced the UV-induced transcription of the genes of the nucleotide excision repair factors DDB2, XPC, DDB1 and XPB and DDB2 protein levels in human cells. Interestingly, knockdown of one subunit of DNA damage recognition complex, hHR23B impaired Rad9-loading onto UV-damaged chromatin. Based on these results, we suggest that Rad9 plays an important role in nucleotide excision repair through mechanisms including maintaining DDB2 protein level in human cells.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23433811     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  11 in total

Review 1.  p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Sunil K Panigrahi; Kevin M Hopkins; Li Wang; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Clamping down on mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Amy M Lyndaker; Ana Vasileva; Debra J Wolgemuth; Robert S Weiss; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Activation of M3 muscarinic receptor by acetylcholine promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion via EGFR/PI3K/AKT pathway.

Authors:  Ran Xu; Chao Shang; Jungang Zhao; Yun Han; Jun Liu; Kuanbing Chen; Wenjun Shi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-12

5.  Prostate cancer: unmet clinical needs and RAD9 as a candidate biomarker for patient management.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Alex J Rai; Richard A Friedman; Kevin M Hopkins; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  DNMT1 and DNMT3B regulate tumorigenicity of human prostate cancer cells by controlling RAD9 expression through targeted methylation.

Authors:  Aiping Zhu; Kevin M Hopkins; Richard A Friedman; Joshua D Bernstock; Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  The DNA damage checkpoint protein RAD9A is essential for male meiosis in the mouse.

Authors:  Ana Vasileva; Kevin M Hopkins; Xiangyuan Wang; Melissa M Weisbach; Richard A Friedman; Debra J Wolgemuth; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Regulation of NEIL1 protein abundance by RAD9 is important for efficient base excision repair.

Authors:  Sunil K Panigrahi; Kevin M Hopkins; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  FOXP1 and NDRG1 act differentially as downstream effectors of RAD9-mediated prostate cancer cell functions.

Authors:  Sunil K Panigrahi; Constantinos G Broustas; Ping Q Cuiper; Renu K Virk; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.850

10.  Increased sensitivity of DNA damage response-deficient cells to stimulated microgravity-induced DNA lesions.

Authors:  Nan Li; Lili An; Haiying Hang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.