| Literature DB >> 23431347 |
Xian Shi1, Yuxian Zhong, Jiarui Yao, Sen Hu, Lu Wang, Gerhard Litscher.
Abstract
Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 groups: (a) control group (HS); (b) Immediate rehydration group (IFR); (c) ST36 electroacupuncture (EA) delay rehydration group (EA/DFR): EA at ST36 immediately after blood loss with infusion 3 h later; (d) EA nonmeridian rehydration group (SEA/DFR): EA at nonacupuncture sites with rehydration similar to EA/DFR; (e) ST36 EA group (EA): EA at ST36 immediately after blood loss with no rehydration. Forty-five percent of the entire blood volume was taken out to make lethal hemorrhagic shock models. We recorded the survival rate, intestinal tissue DAO content, and microcirculation. The survival rate of the EA/DFR group and the IFR group was significantly higher than that of the other three groups (P < 0.05). Twelve hours after blood loss, intestinal tissue DAO content of the EA/DFR group and the IFR group was significantly higher than that of the SEA/DFR group, EA group, and HS group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). The mucosal blood flow of the EA/DFR group and the IFR group was significantly higher than the other groups (P < 0.05 each). We conclude that EA improves the blood pressure and raises the early survival rate of hemorrhagic shock rats, maintains the intestinal barrier function, and improves the degree of intestinal ischemia.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23431347 PMCID: PMC3570926 DOI: 10.1155/2013/750620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier graph of survival rate of rats in each group after 45% blood loss. N = 12 refers to the original number of animals in each group.
Figure 2The change of MAP (mean ± SE) at different time points after blood loss.
The change of DAO activity of intestinal tissue (mean ± SD) at different time points after blood loss.
| Group |
| DAO [U/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.5 h | 3 h | 12 h | ||
| HS | 12 | 48.5 ± 2.7 | 20.1 ± 2.2ab | — |
| IFR | 12 | 49.3 ± 3.9 | 38.1 ± 1.6b | 44.1 ± 2.8b |
| EA/DFR | 12 | 48.8 ± 3.0 | 29.9 ± 4.5a | 37.9 ± 3.4a |
| SEA/DFR | 12 | 49.2 ± 1.1 | 20.5 ± 2.6ab | 30.3 ± 1.3ab |
| EA | 12 | 48.3 ± 1.6 | 28.6 ± 2.8ab | — |
Note: the comparison with IFR group, a P < 0.05; the comparison with EA/DFR group, b P > 0.05. “—” means that the number of surviving animals was too small to calculate statistical values.
The monitoring results of changes in mucosal blood flow (mean ± SD) in each group.
| Group |
| The intestinal mucosal blood flow [perfusion unit (PU)] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.5 h | 3 h | 12 h | ||
| HS | 12 | 211.3 ± 21.9 | 85.6 ± 11.8ac | — |
| IFR | 12 | 209.9 ± 27.1 | 152.8 ± 23.6 | 149.6 ± 10.8 |
| EA/DFR | 12 | 216.8 ± 50.9 | 116.1 ± 16.6a | 151.4 ± 21.4b |
| SEA/DFR | 12 | 212.4 ± 49.5 | 88.7 ± 13.1ac | 102.3 ± 27.2ac |
| EA | 12 | 212.8 ± 36.7 | 115.8 ± 14.2a | — |
Note: the comparison with IFR group, a P < 0.05, b P > 0.05; the comparison with EA/DFR group, c P < 0.05. “—” means that the number of surviving animals was too small to calculate statistical values.