Literature DB >> 23430020

Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Cornelius von Wilmowsky1, Tobias Moest, Emeka Nkenke, Florian Stelzle, Karl Andreas Schlegel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In order to determine whether a newly developed implant material conforms to the requirements of biocompatibility, it must undergo rigorous testing. To correctly interpret the results of studies on implant material osseointegration, it is necessary to have a sound understanding of all the testing methods. The aim of this overview is to elucidate the methods that are used for the experimental evaluation of the osseointegration of implant materials. DISCUSSION: In recent decades, there has been a constant proliferation of new materials and surface modifications in the field of dental implants. This continuous development of innovative biomaterials requires a precise and detailed evaluation in terms of biocompatibility and implant healing before clinical use. The current gold standard is in vivo animal testing on well validated animal models. However, long-term outcome studies on patients have to follow to finally validate and show patient benefit.
CONCLUSION: No experimental set-up can provide answers for all possible research questions. However, a certain transferability of the results to humans might be possible if the experimental set-up is carefully chosen for the aspects and questions being investigated. To enhance the implant survival rate in the rising number of patients with chronic diseases which compromise wound healing and osseointegration, dental implant research on compromised animal models will further gain importance in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23430020     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-013-0397-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  144 in total

1.  On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3-year clinical prospective study.

Authors:  B Friberg; L Sennerby; K Gröndahl; C Bergström; T Bäck; U Lekholm
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Frank Kloss; Jörg Wiltfang; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Kerstin Loos; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  A technique of microradiography.

Authors:  J G GRAHAM
Journal:  Radiography       Date:  1955-06

4.  Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Kaoru Kobayashi; Shinji Shimoda; Yoichi Nakagawa; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Comparison of microcomputed tomographic and microradiographic measurements of cortical bone porosity.

Authors:  D M L Cooper; J R Matyas; M A Katzenberg; B Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: an experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  I Abrahamsson; N U Zitzmann; T Berglundh; A Wennerberg; J Lindhe
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

8.  Peri-implant tissue reaction in bone irradiated the fifth day after implantation in rabbits: histologic and histomorphometric measurements.

Authors:  R Schön; K Ohno; M Kudo; K Michi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Michael Hahn; Konstanze Weinzierl; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Klaus Engelke
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Histomorphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-spray-coated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats.

Authors:  S Vercaigne; J G Wolke; I Naert; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Functionalised High-Performance Oxide Ceramics with Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 (BMP-2) Induced Ossification: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Nicola Maffulli; Frank Hildebrand; Hanno Schenker
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Naser Sargolzaie; Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Hamidreza Arab; Tahereh Koohestani; Mahdiye Fasihi Ramandi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Study of Osteoclast Adhesion to Cortical Bone Surfaces: A Correlative Microscopy Approach for Concomitant Imaging of Cellular Dynamics and Surface Modifications.

Authors:  Michal Shemesh; Sefi Addadi; Yonat Milstein; Benjamin Geiger; Lia Addadi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Bernd Stadlinger; Frank Schwarz; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Ole Jung; Clarissa Precht; Frank Kloss; Alexander Gröbe; Max Heiland; Tobias Ebker
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Endothelial progenitor cells improve the therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cell sheets on irradiated bone defect repair in a rat model.

Authors:  Huan Liu; Yang Jiao; Wei Zhou; Shizhu Bai; Zhihong Feng; Yan Dong; Qian Liu; Xiaoke Feng; Yimin Zhao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  3-dimensional visualization of implant-tissue interface with the polyethylene glycol associated solvent system tissue clearing method.

Authors:  Yating Yi; Yi Men; Dian Jing; Wenjing Luo; Shiwen Zhang; Jian Q Feng; Jin Liu; Woo-Ping Ge; Jun Wang; Hu Zhao
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Effects of a micro/nano rough strontium-loaded surface on osseointegration.

Authors:  Yongfeng Li; Yaping Qi; Qi Gao; Qiang Niu; Mingming Shen; Qian Fu; Kaijin Hu; Liang Kong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-07-16

8.  Development of a quantitative preclinical screening model for implant osseointegration in rat tail vertebra.

Authors:  Sándor Farkasdi; Dávid Pammer; Róbert Rácz; Gergely Hriczó-Koperdák; Bence Tamás Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Beáta Kerémi; József Blazsek; Frederic Cuisinier; Gang Wu; Gábor Varga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Osseointegration of Zirconia Implants after UV-Light or Cold Atmospheric Plasma Surface Treatment In Vivo.

Authors:  Lisa Krautwald; Ralf Smeets; Carolin Stolzer; Rico Rutkowski; Linna Guo; Aline Reitmeier; Martin Gosau; Anders Henningsen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.