Literature DB >> 4014188

Self-reported physical activity compared with maximal oxygen uptake.

S F Siconolfi, T M Lasater, R C Snow, R A Carleton.   

Abstract

Maximal oxygen uptake has been used as a measure of physical fitness. This measure increases by approximately 25% when sedentary individuals become more physically active. Oxygen uptake measurement in the laboratory or estimation in fieldwork is complex and costly with finite risk. For the present study, 36 men and 32 women completed the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Index Questionnaire, including a sweat-inducing physical activity frequency question, and had measurement of oxygen uptake during pedal ergometry. Using maximal oxygen uptake as the measure of fitness, the authors found that the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Index, although more detailed, may be less valid than the simpler sweat induction frequency question for estimating fitness. The correlations observed between the sweat question and oxygen uptake were 0.54 for males, 0.26 for females, and 0.46 for the total group. The correlations between the Physical Activity Index and oxygen uptake were 0.26 for males, 0.08 for females, and 0.29 for the total group. The regression relationship (oxygen uptake = 1.92 X (sweat days) + 23.76; standard error of estimate = 8.63 ml/kg/min) is significant for sweat versus oxygen uptake. While the confidence interval limits the practical ability to predict individual values, low cost, absence of risk, and population validity suggest that fitness can be assessed rapidly and simply for epidemiologic studies with a simple "sweat" question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4014188     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  57 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  The assessment of physical activity by leisure-time physical activity questionnaires.

Authors:  K L Lamb; D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive home environment-focused weight-loss program for adults.

Authors:  Amy A Gorin; Hollie A Raynor; Joseph Fava; Kimberly Maguire; Erica Robichaud; Jennifer Trautvetter; Melissa Crane; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Translating good intentions into physical activity: older adults with low prospective memory ability profit from planning.

Authors:  Julia K Wolff; Lisa M Warner; Jochen P Ziegelmann; Susanne Wurm; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Twin-sibling study and meta-analysis on the heritability of maximal oxygen consumption.

Authors:  Nienke M Schutte; Ineke Nederend; James J Hudziak; Meike Bartels; Eco J C de Geus
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Effects of a community-based intervention on physical activity: the Pawtucket Heart Health Program.

Authors:  C B Eaton; K L Lapane; C E Garber; K M Gans; T M Lasater; R A Carleton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Physical activity and cognition in the northern Manhattan study.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Yeseon Park Moon; Rachel Ruder; Yuen K Cheung; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Physical activity, body mass index, and diabetes risk in men: a prospective study.

Authors:  Lydia C Siegel; Howard D Sesso; Thomas S Bowman; I-Min Lee; JoAnn E Manson; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Michael W Beets; Justin B Moore; Andrew T Kaczynski; Daheia J Barr-Anderson; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.