Literature DB >> 23427819

Nanoporosity significantly enhances the biological performance of engineered glass tissue scaffolds.

Shaojie Wang1, Tia J Kowal, Mona K Marei, Matthias M Falk, Himanshu Jain.   

Abstract

Nanoporosity is known to impact the performance of implants and scaffolds such as bioactive glass (BG) scaffolds, either by providing a higher concentration of bioactive chemical species from enhanced surface area, or due to inherent nanoscale topology, or both. To delineate the role of these two characteristics, BG scaffolds have been fabricated with nearly identical surface area (81 and 83±2 m(2)/g) but significantly different pore size (av. 3.7 and 17.7 nm) by varying both the sintering temperature and the ammonia concentration during the solvent exchange phase of the sol-gel fabrication process. In vitro tests performed with MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells on such scaffolds show that initial cell attachment is increased on samples with the smaller nanopore size, providing the first direct evidence of the influence of nanopore topography on cell response to a bioactive structure. Furthermore, in vivo animal tests in New Zealand rabbits (subcutaneous implantation) indicate that nanopores promote colonization and cell penetration into these scaffolds, further demonstrating the favorable effects of nanopores in tissue-engineering-relevant BG scaffolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23427819      PMCID: PMC3665319          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  36 in total

1.  Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by combination of the gel-casting and polymer sponge methods.

Authors:  Hassna Rehman Ramay; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  In vitro assessment of the biological response to nano-sized hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  J Huang; S M Best; W Bonfield; R A Brooks; N Rushton; S N Jayasinghe; M J Edirisinghe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Vassilis Karageorgiou; David Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Preservation and regeneration of alveolar bone by tissue-engineered implants.

Authors:  Mona K Marei; Samir R Nouh; Manal M Saad; Naglaa S Ismail
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 May-Jun

5.  Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Julian R Jones; Lisa M Ehrenfried; Larry L Hench
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response.

Authors:  B D Boyan; T W Hummert; D D Dean; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface.

Authors:  Z Schwartz; B D Boyan
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.429

8.  Concentrated hydroxyapatite inks for direct-write assembly of 3-D periodic scaffolds.

Authors:  Sarah Michna; Willie Wu; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  In vitro release kinetics of proteins from bioactive foams.

Authors:  R F S Lenza; J R Jones; W L Vasconcelos; L L Hench
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates.

Authors:  Ana I Teixeira; Paul F Nealey; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  11 in total

1.  Modification of resin modified glass ionomer cement by addition of bioactive glass nanoparticles.

Authors:  Alireza Valanezhad; Tetsuro Odatsu; Koichi Udoh; Takanobu Shiraishi; Takashi Sawase; Ikuya Watanabe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Role of phase separation on the biological performance of 45S5 Bioglass®.

Authors:  Tia J Kowal; Roman Golovchak; Tanuj Chokshi; Joseph Harms; Ukrit Thamma; Himanshu Jain; Matthias M Falk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Can an InChI for Nano Address the Need for a Simplified Representation of Complex Nanomaterials across Experimental and Nanoinformatics Studies?

Authors:  Iseult Lynch; Antreas Afantitis; Thomas Exner; Martin Himly; Vladimir Lobaskin; Philip Doganis; Dieter Maier; Natasha Sanabria; Anastasios G Papadiamantis; Anna Rybinska-Fryca; Maciej Gromelski; Tomasz Puzyn; Egon Willighagen; Blair D Johnston; Mary Gulumian; Marianne Matzke; Amaia Green Etxabe; Nathan Bossa; Angela Serra; Irene Liampa; Stacey Harper; Kaido Tämm; Alexander CØ Jensen; Pekka Kohonen; Luke Slater; Andreas Tsoumanis; Dario Greco; David A Winkler; Haralambos Sarimveis; Georgia Melagraki
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 4.  Nanomaterials, inflammation, and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jagannath Padmanabhan; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2014-11-25

Review 5.  Recent advances and future perspectives of sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses: a review.

Authors:  Kalim Deshmukh; Tomáš Kovářík; Tomáš Křenek; Denitsa Docheva; Theresia Stich; Josef Pola
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Potential of tailored amorphous multiporous calcium silicate glass for pulp capping regenerative endodontics-A preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Chao-An Chen; Xiaofei Zhu; Brian R Morrow; Ukrit Thamma; Tia J Kowal; Hassan M Moawad; Matthias M Falk; Himanshu Jain; George T-J Huang
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.991

7.  Nanostructure of bioactive glass affects bone cell attachment via protein restructuring upon adsorption.

Authors:  Ukrit Thamma; Tia J Kowal; Matthias M Falk; Himanshu Jain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Cells and material-based strategies for regenerative endodontics.

Authors:  Zain Siddiqui; Amanda M Acevedo-Jake; Alexandra Griffith; Nurten Kadincesme; Kinga Dabek; Dana Hindi; Ka Kyung Kim; Yoshifumi Kobayashi; Emi Shimizu; Vivek Kumar
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-11-30

9.  The importance of factorial design in tissue engineering and biomaterials science: Optimisation of cell seeding efficiency on dermal scaffolds as a case study.

Authors:  Alexandra Levin; Vaibhav Sharma; Lilian Hook; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 7.813

10.  Effect of bioactive glass nanoparticles on biological properties of PLGA/collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Samira Nokhasteh; Alireza Sadeghi-Avalshahr; Amir Mahdi Molavi; Mohammad Khorsand-Ghayeni; Hojjat Naderi-Meshkin
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.