Literature DB >> 23426105

Surgical outcome of discrete subaortic stenosis in adults: a multicenter study.

Denise van der Linde1, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Helena J Heuvelman, Werner Budts, Arie P J van Dijk, Maarten Witsenburg, Sing C Yap, Angela Oxenius, Candice K Silversides, Erwin N Oechslin, Ad J J C Bogers, Johanna J M Takkenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discrete subaortic stenosis is notable for its unpredictable hemodynamic progression in childhood and high reoperation rate; however, data about adulthood are scarce. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Adult patients who previously underwent surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort study. Mixed-effects and joint models were used to assess the postoperative progression of discrete subaortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, as well as reoperation. A total of 313 patients at 4 centers were included (age at baseline, 20.2 years [25th-75th percentile, 18.4-31.0 years]; 52% male). Median follow-up duration was 12.9 years (25th-75th percentile, 6.2-20.1 years), yielding 5617 patient-years. The peak instantaneous left ventricular outflow tract gradient decreased from 75.7±28.0 mm Hg preoperatively to 15.1±14.1 mm Hg postoperatively (P<0.001) and thereafter increased over time at a rate of 1.31±0.16 mm Hg/y (P=0.001). Mild aortic regurgitation was present in 68% but generally did not progress over time (P=0.76). A preoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥80 mm Hg was a predictor for progression to moderate aortic regurgitation postoperatively. Eighty patients required at least 1 reoperation (1.8% per patient-year). Predictors for reoperation included female sex (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.30) and left ventricular outflow tract gradient progression (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.62). Additional myectomy did not reduce the risk for reoperation (P=0.92) but significantly increased the risk of a complete heart block requiring pacemaker implantation (8.1% versus 1.7%; P=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Survival is excellent after surgery for discrete subaortic stenosis; however, reoperation for recurrent discrete subaortic stenosis is not uncommon. Over time, the left ventricular outflow tract gradient slowly increases and mild aortic regurgitation is common, although generally nonprogressive over time. Myectomy does not show additional advantages, and because it is associated with an increased risk of complete heart block, it should not be performed routinely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426105     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

1.  Subaortic membrane mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mark Joseph Anderson; Adelaide Arruda-Olson; Bernard Gersh; Jeffrey Geske
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-04

2.  When Is It Better to Wait? Surgical Timing and Recurrence Risk for Children Undergoing Repair of Subaortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Brett R Anderson; Jennifer E Tingo; Julie S Glickstein; Paul J Chai; Emile A Bacha; Alejandro J Torres
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Adults With Left-Sided Pressure Loading Lesions.

Authors:  Anjori Bhatia; Tapan H Mehta; Patrick Manning; Jeffrey T Kuvin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Subvalvular aortic stenosis: a review of current literature.

Authors:  Subodh R Devabhaktuni; Eyas Chakfeh; Ali O Malik; Joshua A Pengson; Jibran Rana; Chowdhury H Ahsan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Routine Septal Myectomy During Subaortic Stenosis Membrane Resection: Effect on Recurrence Rates.

Authors:  Alyssa A Mazurek; Sunkyung Yu; Ray Lowery; Richard G Ohye
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Robot-assisted septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Authors:  Zain Khalpey; Lev Korovin; W Randolph Chitwood; Robert Poston
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Imaging adult patients with discrete subvalvar aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Sarah S Pickard; Tal Geva
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Paediatric subaortic stenosis: long-term outcome and risk factors for reoperation.

Authors:  Rik De Wolf; Katrien François; Thierry Bové; Ilse Coomans; Katya De Groote; Hans De Wilde; Joseph Panzer; Kristof Vandekerckhove; Daniël De Wolf
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

9.  Computational Assessment of Valvular Dysfunction in Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: A Parametric Study.

Authors:  Jason A Shar; Sundeep G Keswani; K Jane Grande-Allen; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.305

10.  Echocardiographic Diagnosis of a Subaortic Membrane Attached to the Free Edge of the Right Coronary Cusp of the Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Rohesh J Fernando; Christopher Sopkovich
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2020-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.