Literature DB >> 33432514

Computational Assessment of Valvular Dysfunction in Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: A Parametric Study.

Jason A Shar1, Sundeep G Keswani2, K Jane Grande-Allen3, Philippe Sucosky4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is a left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction caused by a membranous lesion. DSS is associated with steep aortoseptal angles (AoSAs) and is a risk factor for aortic regurgitation (AR). However, the etiology of AR secondary to DSS remains unknown. This study aimed at quantifying computationally the impact of AoSA steepening and DSS on aortic valve (AV) hemodynamics and AR.
METHODS: An LV geometry reconstructed from cine-MRI data was connected to an AV geometry to generate a unified 2D LV-AV model. Six geometrical variants were considered: unobstructed (CTRL) and DSS-obstructed LVOT (DSS), each reflecting three AoSA variations (110°, 120°, 130°). Fluid-structure interaction simulations were run to compute LVOT flow, AV leaflet dynamics, and regurgitant fraction (RF).
RESULTS: AoSA steepening and DSS generated vortex dynamics alterations and stenotic flow conditions. While the CTRL-110° model generated the highest degree of leaflet opening asymmetry, DSS preferentially altered superior leaflet kinematics, and caused leaflet-dependent alterations in systolic fluttering. LVOT steepening and DSS subjected the leaflets to increasing WSS overloads (up to 94% increase in temporal shear magnitude), while DSS also increased WSS bidirectionality on the inferior leaflet belly (+ 0.30-point in oscillatory shear index). Although AoSA steepening and DSS increased diastolic transvalvular backflow, regurgitant fractions (RF < 7%) remained below the threshold defining clinical mild AR.
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical interactions between AV leaflets and LVOT steepening/DSS hemodynamic derangements do not cause AR. However, the leaflet WSS abnormalities predicted in those anatomies provide new support to a mechanobiological etiology of AR secondary to DSS.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic regurgitation; Aortic valve; Discrete subaortic stenosis; Fluid-structure interaction modeling; Hemodynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432514      PMCID: PMC8272786          DOI: 10.1007/s13239-020-00513-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.305


  63 in total

Review 1.  Discrete subaortic stenosis: long-term prognosis on the progression of the obstruction and of the aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  P Stassano; L Di Tommaso; A Contaldo; M Monaco; M Mottola; A Musumeci; G Coronella; N Spampinato
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve.

Authors:  Eli J Weinberg; Mohammad Reza Kaazempur Mofrad
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2007-12

3.  Bone morphogenetic protein-4 and transforming growth factor-beta1 mechanisms in acute valvular response to supra-physiologic hemodynamic stresses.

Authors:  Ling Sun; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 4.  Imaging adult patients with discrete subvalvar aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Sarah S Pickard; Tal Geva
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Surgical treatment of subaortic obstruction in adolescent and adults: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Vedat Erentug; Nilgün Bozbuga; Kaan Kirali; Deniz Goksedef; Esat Akinci; Omer Isik; Cevat Yakut
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Surgical outcome of discrete subaortic stenosis in adults: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Denise van der Linde; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Helena J Heuvelman; Werner Budts; Arie P J van Dijk; Maarten Witsenburg; Sing C Yap; Angela Oxenius; Candice K Silversides; Erwin N Oechslin; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Fluid-structure interaction of an aortic heart valve prosthesis driven by an animated anatomic left ventricle.

Authors:  Trung Bao Le; Fotis Sotiropoulos
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Mechanobiology in Cardiovascular Disease Management: Potential Strategies and Current Needs.

Authors:  Samantha K Atkins; Andrew McNally; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-10

9.  Mixed Valvular Disease Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Quantification and Systematic Differentiation Using Clinical Measurements and Image-Based Patient-Specific In Silico Modeling.

Authors:  Zahra Keshavarz-Motamed; Seyedvahid Khodaei; Farhad Rikhtegar Nezami; Junedh M Amrute; Suk Joon Lee; Jonathan Brown; Eyal Ben-Assa; Tamara Garcia Camarero; Javier Ruano Calvo; Stephanie Sellers; Philipp Blanke; Jonathon Leipsic; Jose M de la Torre Hernandez; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Patient-specific CFD simulation of intraventricular haemodynamics based on 3D ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  A M Bavo; A M Pouch; J Degroote; J Vierendeels; J H Gorman; R C Gorman; P Segers
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.