Literature DB >> 34002231

Paediatric subaortic stenosis: long-term outcome and risk factors for reoperation.

Rik De Wolf1, Katrien François2, Thierry Bové2, Ilse Coomans3, Katya De Groote3, Hans De Wilde3, Joseph Panzer3, Kristof Vandekerckhove3, Daniël De Wolf3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgical repair of subaortic stenosis (SAS) is associated with a substantial reoperation risk. We aimed to identify risk factors for reintervention in relation to discrete and tunnel-type SAS morphology.
METHODS: Single-centre retrospective study of paediatric SAS diagnosed between 1992 and 2017. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify reintervention risk factors.
RESULTS: Eighty-five children [median age 2.5 (0.7-6.5) years at diagnosis] with a median follow-up of 10.1 (5.5-16.4) years were included. Surgery was executed in 83% (n = 71). Freedom from reoperation was 88 ± 5% at 5 years and 82 ± 6% at 10 years for discrete SAS, compared to, respectively, 33 ± 16% and 17 ± 14% for tunnel-type SAS (log-rank P < 0.001). Independent risk factors for reintervention were a postoperative gradient >20 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR) 6.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-24.1; P = 0.005], tunnel-type SAS (HR 7.46, 95% CI 2.48-22.49; P < 0.001), aortic annulus z-score <-2 (HR 11.07, 95% CI 3.03-40.47; P < 0.001) and age at intervention <2 years (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.09-9.86; P = 0.035). Addition of septal myectomy at initial intervention was not associated with lesser reintervention. Fourteen children with a lower left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (P < 0.001) and older age at diagnosis (P = 0.024) were followed expectatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with SAS remain at risk for reintervention, despite initially effective LVOT relief. Regardless of SAS morphology, age <2 years at first intervention, a postoperative gradient >20 mmHg and presence of a hypoplastic aortic annulus are independent risk factors for reintervention. More extensive LVOT surgery might be considered at an earlier stage in these children. SAS presenting in older children with a low LVOT gradient at diagnosis shows little progression, justifying an expectative approach.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Left ventricular outflow tract; Subaortic stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34002231      PMCID: PMC8691677          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  28 in total

1.  Echocardiographic follow-up of children with isolated discrete subaortic stenosis.

Authors:  Kadir Babaoglu; Ayse Guler Eroglu; Funda Oztunç; Levent Saltik; Tevfik Demir; Gulay Ahunbay; Alper Guzeltas; Gürkan Cetin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients.

Authors:  E A Newfeld; A J Muster; M H Paul; F S Idriss; W L Riker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Modified Konno-Rastan procedure for subaortic stenosis: indications, operative techniques, and results.

Authors:  P T Roughneen; S Y DeLeon; F Cetta; D A Vitullo; T J Bell; E A Fisher; B P Blakeman; M Bakhos
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Natural history and surgical outcomes for isolated discrete subaortic stenosis in children.

Authors:  C V Rohlicek; S F del Pino; M Hosking; J Miro; J M Côté; J Finley
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Discrete subaortic stenosis in adults: increased prevalence and slow rate of progression of the obstruction and aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  J M Oliver; A González; P Gallego; A Sánchez-Recalde; F Benito; J M Mesa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Benefits of early surgical repair in fixed subaortic stenosis.

Authors:  R Brauner; H Laks; D C Drinkwater; O Shvarts; K Eghbali; A Galindo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Surgical outcome of discrete subaortic stenosis in adults: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Denise van der Linde; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Helena J Heuvelman; Werner Budts; Arie P J van Dijk; Maarten Witsenburg; Sing C Yap; Angela Oxenius; Candice K Silversides; Erwin N Oechslin; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Surgery for discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis: actuarial survival, hemodynamic results, and acquired aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  J Brown; L Stevens; L Lynch; R Caldwell; D Girod; R Hurwitz; L Mahony; H King
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Risk factors for reoperation after repair of discrete subaortic stenosis in children.

Authors:  Alon Geva; Colin J McMahon; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Laila Mohammed; Pedro J del Nido; Tal Geva
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Long-term outcomes and risk factors for aortic regurgitation after discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis resection in children.

Authors:  Sarah S Pickard; Alon Geva; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Pedro J del Nido; Tal Geva
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.