BACKGROUND: Patients increasingly assume active roles in their mental health care. While there is a growing interest in patient involvement and patient-reported outcomes, there is insufficient research on the outcomes of patient involvement. OBJECTIVE: The research questions in this study are as follows: 'To what extent is perceived patient involvement associated with satisfaction and empowerment?'; 'What is the nature of the relationship between satisfaction and empowerment?'; and 'To what extent are background variables associated with satisfaction and empowerment?'. We assumed that a higher degree of patient involvement is associated with higher satisfaction and empowerment scores and that satisfaction and empowerment are positively associated. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered using surveys of 111 patients of 36 multidisciplinary care networks for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, patient involvement and satisfaction were measured using a new questionnaire. Empowerment was assessed using the Dutch Empowerment Scale. Descriptive, univariate (Pearson's r and independent-samples t-tests), multivariate (hierarchical forced entry regression) and mixed-model analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The hypotheses of positive associations between patient involvement, satisfaction and empowerment are confirmed. The demographics are not significantly related to satisfaction or empowerment, except for gender. Men reported higher empowerment scores than did women. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Making patient involvement a reality is more than just an ethical imperative. It provides an opportunity to enhance patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and empowerment. Future research should focus on the nature of the association between satisfaction and empowerment.
BACKGROUND:Patients increasingly assume active roles in their mental health care. While there is a growing interest in patient involvement and patient-reported outcomes, there is insufficient research on the outcomes of patient involvement. OBJECTIVE: The research questions in this study are as follows: 'To what extent is perceived patient involvement associated with satisfaction and empowerment?'; 'What is the nature of the relationship between satisfaction and empowerment?'; and 'To what extent are background variables associated with satisfaction and empowerment?'. We assumed that a higher degree of patient involvement is associated with higher satisfaction and empowerment scores and that satisfaction and empowerment are positively associated. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered using surveys of 111 patients of 36 multidisciplinary care networks for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, patient involvement and satisfaction were measured using a new questionnaire. Empowerment was assessed using the Dutch Empowerment Scale. Descriptive, univariate (Pearson's r and independent-samples t-tests), multivariate (hierarchical forced entry regression) and mixed-model analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The hypotheses of positive associations between patient involvement, satisfaction and empowerment are confirmed. The demographics are not significantly related to satisfaction or empowerment, except for gender. Men reported higher empowerment scores than did women. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Making patient involvement a reality is more than just an ethical imperative. It provides an opportunity to enhance patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and empowerment. Future research should focus on the nature of the association between satisfaction and empowerment.
Authors: Tara W Strine; Kurt Kroenke; Satvinder Dhingra; Lina S Balluz; Olinda Gonzalez; Joyce T Berry; Ali H Mokdad Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Lisette Ackermans; Michiel G Hageman; A H Bos; Daniel Haverkamp; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jennifer Freytag; Zhixin J Jiang; Thomas P Giordano; Robert A Westbrook; Sheryl A McCurdy; Sarah Njue-Marendes; Bich N Dang Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2019-03-25
Authors: Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Kevin Mertz; Romil F Shah; Sara L Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Marc Safran; Ariel Palanca; Serena S Hu; Michael Gardner; Derek F Amanatullah; Robin N Kamal Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Oxana Palesh; Arianna Aldridge-Gerry; Kelly Bugos; David Pickham; Jie Jane Chen; Ralph Greco; Susan M Swetter Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Luk Bruyneel; Sabine Van Houdt; Ellen Coeckelberghs; Walter Sermeus; Else Tambuyzer; Peter Cosemans; Gert Peeters; Kris Van den Broeck; Ilse Weeghmans; Kris Vanhaecht Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Daniel C Stokes; Rachel Kishton; Haley J McCalpin; Arthur P Pelullo; Zachary F Meisel; Rinad S Beidas; Raina M Merchant Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.157