Literature DB >> 32744134

A Simple Goal Elicitation Tool Improves Shared Decision Making in Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kevin Mertz1, Romil F Shah1, Sara L Eppler1, Jeffrey Yao1, Marc Safran1, Ariel Palanca1, Serena S Hu1, Michael Gardner1, Derek F Amanatullah1, Robin N Kamal1.   

Abstract

Introduction. Shared decision making involves educating the patient, eliciting their goals, and collaborating on a decision for treatment. Goal elicitation is challenging for physicians as previous research has shown that patients do not bring up their goals on their own. Failure to properly elicit patient goals leads to increased patient misconceptions and decisional conflict. We performed a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a simple goal elicitation tool in improving patient involvement in decision making. Methods. We conducted a randomized, single-blind study of new patients presenting to a single, outpatient surgical center. Prior to their consultation, the intervention group received a demographics questionnaire and a goal elicitation worksheet. The control group received a demographics questionnaire only. After the consultation, both groups were asked to complete the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) survey. We compared the mean PICS scores for the intervention and control groups using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test. Secondary analysis included a qualitative content analysis of the patient goals. Results. Our final cohort consisted of 96 patients (46 intervention, 50 control). Both groups were similar in terms of demographic composition. The intervention group had a significantly higher mean (SD) PICS score compared to the control group (9.04 [2.15] v. 7.54 [2.27], P < 0.01). Thirty-nine percent of patient goals were focused on receiving a diagnosis or treatment, while 21% of patients wanted to receive education regarding their illness or their treatment options. Discussion. A single-step goal elicitation tool was effective in improving patient-perceived involvement in their care. This tool can be efficiently implemented in both academic and nonacademic settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Goal elicitation; orthopedic surgery; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32744134      PMCID: PMC7647048          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20943520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  31 in total

1.  Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Liana Fraenkel; Robert J Volk; Vanessa Cox; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Cochrane in CORR ®: Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions.

Authors:  Kim Madden; Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A multi-site study of the feasibility and clinical utility of Goal Attainment Scaling in geriatric day hospitals.

Authors:  Paul Stolee; Marlene Awad; Kerry Byrne; Ryan Deforge; Susan Clements; Christine Glenny
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Patient-centered Treatment Decisions for Urethral Stricture: Conjoint Analysis Improves Surgical Decision-making.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Isabel E Allen; Thomas W Gaither; Tracy Lin; Jie Ting; E Charles Osterberg; Leslie Wilson; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.

Authors:  Sandra R Wilson; Peg Strub; A Sonia Buist; Sarah B Knowles; Philip W Lavori; Jodi Lapidus; William M Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment?

Authors:  Else Tambuyzer; Chantal Van Audenhove
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patient led goal setting in chronic low back pain-What goals are important to the patient and are they aligned to what we measure?

Authors:  Tania Gardner; Kathryn Refshauge; James McAuley; Stephen Goodall; Markus Hübscher; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-04-27

8.  Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial.

Authors:  Heather L Shepherd; Alexandra Barratt; Lyndal J Trevena; Kevin McGeechan; Karen Carey; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow; Chris B Del Mar; Vikki Entwistle; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-09

9.  A qualitative descriptive study on the alignment of care goals between older persons with multi-morbidities, their family physicians and informal caregivers.

Authors:  Kerry Kuluski; Ashlinder Gill; Gayathri Naganathan; Ross Upshur; R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?

Authors:  Michele Heisler; Sandeep Vijan; Robert M Anderson; Peter A Ubel; Steven J Bernstein; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does a Question Prompt List Improve Perceived Involvement in Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with the AskShareKnow Questions? A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David J Mariano; Adam Liu; Sara L Eppler; Michael J Gardner; Serena Hu; Marc Safran; Loretta Chou; Derek F Amanatullah; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Does a Question Prompt List Improve Perceived Involvement in Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with the AskShareKnow Questions? A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.