Literature DB >> 34015944

Online Reviews of Mental Health Treatment Facilities: Narrative Themes Associated With Positive and Negative Ratings.

Daniel C Stokes1, Rachel Kishton1, Haley J McCalpin1, Arthur P Pelullo1, Zachary F Meisel1, Rinad S Beidas1, Raina M Merchant1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies indicate that patients' satisfaction with mental health care is correlated with both treatment outcomes and quality of life. The aims of this study were to describe online reviews of mental health treatment facilities, including key themes in review content, and to evaluate the correlation between narrative review themes, facility characteristics, and review ratings.
METHODS: United States National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS) facilities were linked to corresponding Yelp pages, created between March 2007 and September 2019. Correlations between review ratings and both machine learning-generated latent Dirichlet allocation topics and N-MHSS-reported facility characteristics were measured by using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient. Significance was defined by a Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.001.
RESULTS: Of 10,191 unique mental health treatment facilities, 1,383 (13.6%) had relevant Yelp pages with 8,133 corresponding reviews. The number of newly reviewed facilities and the number of new reviews increased throughout the study period. Narrative topics positively correlated with review ratings included caring staff (Spearman's ρ=0.39) and nonpharmacologic treatment (ρ=0.16). Topics negatively correlated with review ratings included rude staff (ρ=-0.14) and safety and abuse (ρ=-0.14). Of 126 N-MHSS survey items, 11 were positively correlated with review rating, including "outpatient mental health facility" (ρ=0.13), and 33 were negatively correlated with review rating, including accepting Medicare (ρ=-0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: Narrative topics provide information beyond what is currently collected through the N-MHSS. Topics associated with positive and negative reviews, such as staff attitude toward patients, can guide improvement in patients' satisfaction and engagement with mental health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Natural language processing; Patient satisfaction; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34015944      PMCID: PMC9116241          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   4.157


  31 in total

1.  Patient Safety In Inpatient Psychiatry: A Remaining Frontier For Health Policy.

Authors:  Morgan C Shields; Maureen T Stewart; Kathleen R Delaney
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The patient experience and health outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew P Manary; William Boulding; Richard Staelin; Seth W Glickman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The treatment gap in mental health care.

Authors:  Robert Kohn; Shekhar Saxena; Itzhak Levav; Benedetto Saraceno
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Patient narratives in Yelp reviews offer insight into opioid experiences and the challenges of pain management.

Authors:  Rachel L Graves; Jesse Goldshear; Jeanmarie Perrone; Lyle Ungar; Elissa Klinger; Zachary F Meisel; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2018-02-16

5.  Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Windle; Helena Tee; Alina Sabitova; Nikolina Jovanovic; Stefan Priebe; Catherine Carr
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 21.596

6.  From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Audrey Lyndon; Renée Asteria-Peñaloza; L Elizabeth Goldman; Grace A Lin; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Satisfaction of psychotic patients with care and its value to predict outcomes.

Authors:  J M Vermeulen; N F Schirmbeck; M J van Tricht; L de Haan
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.361

8.  Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.

Authors:  Benjamin L Ranard; Rachel M Werner; Tadas Antanavicius; H Andrew Schwartz; Robert J Smith; Zachary F Meisel; David A Asch; Lyle H Ungar; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update.

Authors:  Lisa B Dixon; Yael Holoshitz; Ilana Nossel
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  Association of Online Consumer Reviews of Skilled Nursing Facilities With Patient Rehospitalization Rates.

Authors:  Kira L Ryskina; Anietie U Andy; Kirstin A Manges; Kierra A Foley; Rachel M Werner; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-05-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Association Between Crowdsourced Health Care Facility Ratings and Mortality in US Counties.

Authors:  Daniel C Stokes; Arthur P Pelullo; Nandita Mitra; Zachary F Meisel; Eugenia C South; David A Asch; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.