Literature DB >> 23422424

Mining tertiary structural motifs for assessment of designability.

Jian Zhang1, Gevorg Grigoryan.   

Abstract

The observation of a limited secondary-structural alphabet in native proteins, with significant sequence preferences, has profoundly influenced the fields of protein design and structure prediction (Simons, Kooperberg, Huang, & Baker, 1997; Verschueren et al., 2011). In the era of structural genomics, as the size of the structural dataset continues to grow rapidly, it is becoming possible to extend this analysis to tertiary structural motifs and their sequences. For a hypothetical tertiary motif, the rate of its utilization in natural proteins may be used to assess its designability-the ease with which the motif can be realized with natural amino acids. This requires a structural similarity search methodology, which rather than looking for global topological agreement (more appropriate for categorization of full proteins or domains), identifies detailed geometric matches. In this chapter, we introduce such a method, called MaDCaT, and demonstrate its use by assessing the designability landscapes of two tertiary structural motifs. We also show that such analysis can establish structure/sequence links by providing the sequence constraints necessary to encode designable motifs. As logical extension of their secondary-structure counterparts, tertiary structural preferences will likely prove extremely useful in de novo protein design and structure prediction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422424      PMCID: PMC4222026          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394292-0.00002-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  55 in total

1.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structural comparison and classification of alpha-helical transmembrane domains based on helix interaction patterns.

Authors:  Angelika Fuchs; Dmitrij Frishman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-09

3.  The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies.

Authors:  Nir London; Dana Movshovitz-Attias; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Why are some proteins structures so common?

Authors:  S Govindarajan; R A Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete.

Authors:  R H Lathrop
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-09

6.  Structural characteristics of novel protein folds.

Authors:  Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Joseph M Dybas; Andras Fiser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  Amelie Stein; Arnaud Céol; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution.

Authors:  Lesley H Greene; Tony E Lewis; Sarah Addou; Alison Cuff; Tim Dallman; Mark Dibley; Oliver Redfern; Frances Pearl; Rekha Nambudiry; Adam Reid; Ian Sillitoe; Corin Yeats; Janet M Thornton; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments.

Authors:  Antonina Andreeva; Dave Howorth; John-Marc Chandonia; Steven E Brenner; Tim J P Hubbard; Cyrus Chothia; Alexey G Murzin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  PepX: a structural database of non-redundant protein-peptide complexes.

Authors:  Peter Vanhee; Joke Reumers; Francois Stricher; Lies Baeten; Luis Serrano; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Artificial Diiron Enzymes with a De Novo Designed Four-Helix Bundle Structure.

Authors:  Marco Chino; Ornella Maglio; Flavia Nastri; Vincenzo Pavone; William F DeGrado; Angela Lombardi
Journal:  Eur J Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Rapid search for tertiary fragments reveals protein sequence-structure relationships.

Authors:  Jianfu Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Design of self-assembling transmembrane helical bundles to elucidate principles required for membrane protein folding and ion transport.

Authors:  Nathan H Joh; Gevorg Grigoryan; Yibing Wu; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A Compact Structure of Cytochrome c Trapped in a Lysine-Ligated State: Loop Refolding and Functional Implications of a Conformational Switch.

Authors:  Jeanine F Amacher; Fangfang Zhong; George P Lisi; Michael Q Zhu; Stephanie L Alden; Kevin R Hoke; Dean R Madden; Ekaterina V Pletneva
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Diversity and motif conservation in protein 3D structural landscape: exploration by a new multivariate simulation method.

Authors:  Rajani R Joshi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 6.  Algorithms for protein design.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Hunter M Nisonoff; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Computational design of selective peptides to discriminate between similar PDZ domains in an oncogenic pathway.

Authors:  Fan Zheng; Heather Jewell; Jeremy Fitzpatrick; Jian Zhang; Dale F Mierke; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Protein structural motifs in prediction and design.

Authors:  Craig O Mackenzie; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  The membrane- and soluble-protein helix-helix interactome: similar geometry via different interactions.

Authors:  Shao-Qing Zhang; Daniel W Kulp; Chaim A Schramm; Marco Mravic; Ilan Samish; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  A real-time all-atom structural search engine for proteins.

Authors:  Gabriel Gonzalez; Brett Hannigan; William F DeGrado
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.