Literature DB >> 25451599

Computational design of selective peptides to discriminate between similar PDZ domains in an oncogenic pathway.

Fan Zheng1, Heather Jewell2, Jeremy Fitzpatrick3, Jian Zhang1, Dale F Mierke3, Gevorg Grigoryan4.   

Abstract

Reagents that target protein-protein interactions to rewire signaling are of great relevance in biological research. Computational protein design may offer a means of creating such reagents on demand, but methods for encoding targeting selectivity are sorely needed. This is especially challenging when targeting interactions with ubiquitous recognition modules--for example, PDZ domains, which bind C-terminal sequences of partner proteins. Here we consider the problem of designing selective PDZ inhibitor peptides in the context of an oncogenic signaling pathway, in which two PDZ domains (NHERF-2 PDZ2-N2P2 and MAGI-3 PDZ6-M3P6) compete for a receptor C-terminus to differentially modulate oncogenic activities. Because N2P2 has been shown to increase tumorigenicity and M3P6 to decreases it, we sought to design peptides that inhibit N2P2 without affecting M3P6. We developed a structure-based computational design framework that models peptide flexibility in binding yet is efficient enough to rapidly analyze tradeoffs between affinity and selectivity. Designed peptides showed low-micromolar inhibition constants for N2P2 and no detectable M3P6 binding. Peptides designed for reverse discrimination bound M3P6 tighter than N2P2, further testing our technology. Experimental and computational analysis of selectivity determinants revealed significant indirect energetic coupling in the binding site. Successful discrimination between N2P2 and M3P6, despite their overlapping binding preferences, is highly encouraging for computational approaches to selective PDZ targeting, especially because design relied on a homology model of M3P6. Still, we demonstrate specific deficiencies of structural modeling that must be addressed to enable truly robust design. The presented framework is general and can be applied in many scenarios to engineer selective targeting.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PDZ domains; computational protein design; interaction selectivity; pathway modulation; selective targeting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451599      PMCID: PMC4970318          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  70 in total

Review 1.  Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains.

Authors:  Tony Pawson; Piers Nash
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Making protein interactions druggable: targeting PDZ domains.

Authors:  Kumlesh K Dev
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Coarse-graining protein energetics in sequence variables.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan; Steve R Lustig; Amy E Keating; Gerbrand Ceder; Dane Morgan
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling.

Authors:  Konstantin Arnold; Lorenza Bordoli; Jürgen Kopp; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Uncovering quantitative protein interaction networks for mouse PDZ domains using protein microarrays.

Authors:  Michael A Stiffler; Viara P Grantcharova; Mark Sevecka; Gavin MacBeath
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL.

Authors:  Xiaoran Fu; James R Apgar; Amy E Keating
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Learning Sequence Determinants of Protein:protein Interaction Specificity with Sparse Graphical Models.

Authors:  Hetunandan Kamisetty; Bornika Ghosh; Christopher James Langmead; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Res Comput Mol Biol       Date:  2014

10.  Lysophosphatidic acid prevents apoptosis of Caco-2 colon cancer cells via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphorylation of Bad.

Authors:  Raluca Rusovici; Amr Ghaleb; Hyunsuk Shim; Vincent W Yang; C Chris Yun
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-05-03
View more
  11 in total

1.  Computationally optimized deimmunization libraries yield highly mutated enzymes with low immunogenicity and enhanced activity.

Authors:  Regina S Salvat; Deeptak Verma; Andrew S Parker; Jack R Kirsch; Seth A Brooks; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Deletion of Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 2 represses colon cancer progress by suppression of Stat3 and CD24.

Authors:  Michihiro Yoshida; Luqing Zhao; Gevorg Grigoryan; Hyunsuk Shim; Peijian He; C Chris Yun
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Enriching Peptide Libraries for Binding Affinity and Specificity Through Computationally Directed Library Design.

Authors:  Glenna Wink Foight; T Scott Chen; Daniel Richman; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

Review 4.  Targeting the Wnt signaling pathway for breast cancer bone metastasis therapy.

Authors:  Jingyao Cui; Haoran Chen; Kaiwen Zhang; Xin Li
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Computational Tools and Strategies to Develop Peptide-Based Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Maxence Delaunay; Tâp Ha-Duong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Computationally Designed Bispecific Antibodies using Negative State Repertoires.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Karen J Froning; Shane Atwell; Hector Aldaz; Anna Pustilnik; Frances Lu; Flora Huang; Richard Yuan; Saleema Hassanali; Aaron K Chamberlain; Jonathan R Fitchett; Stephen J Demarest; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  MFPred: Rapid and accurate prediction of protein-peptide recognition multispecificity using self-consistent mean field theory.

Authors:  Aliza B Rubenstein; Manasi A Pethe; Sagar D Khare
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Structural basis for peptide substrate specificities of glycosyltransferase GalNAc-T2.

Authors:  Sai Pooja Mahajan; Yashes Srinivasan; Jason W Labonte; Matthew P DeLisa; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 13.084

9.  In Silico Generation of Peptides by Replica Exchange Monte Carlo: Docking-Based Optimization of Maltose-Binding-Protein Ligands.

Authors:  Anna Russo; Pasqualina Liana Scognamiglio; Rolando Pablo Hong Enriquez; Carlo Santambrogio; Rita Grandori; Daniela Marasco; Antonio Giordano; Giacinto Scoles; Sara Fortuna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A general-purpose protein design framework based on mining sequence-structure relationships in known protein structures.

Authors:  Jianfu Zhou; Alexandra E Panaitiu; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.