Literature DB >> 23420190

Shadow masking for nanomaterial-based biosensors incorporated with a microfluidic device.

Jiyong Huang1, Innam Lee, Xiliang Luo, Xinyan Tracy Cui, Minhee Yun.   

Abstract

Integrating PDMS channels and chips containing pre-functionalized biosensors into microfluidic devices with irreversible sealing has been challenging because the integration process requires use of an O2 plasma treatment that usually destroys the biosensors. In this study, we examined the usefulness of introducing a shadow mask into the process as a method of protecting the pre-functionalized biosensors. Single nanowire sensors were pre-functionalized with fluorescently labeled biomolecules and then subjected to O2 plasma with and without the shadow mask. Results from the two groups were then compared. Those sensors without a shadow mask were destroyed, giving the sensor an infinite resistance and reduced fluorescence intensity. In contrast, the sensors with the shadow mask were protected and exhibited little changes in the resistance and fluorescence intensity. Then two different nanowires, aptamers incorporated polypyrrole nanowire (entrapment) and antibodies immobilized polyaniline nanowire (surface covalent binding), were used to investigate their detection performance before and after the plasma treatment in the presence of shadow mask. The protected samples showed a good sensitivity to the targets with a slight reduction in response compared with the as-prepared samples. After the O2 plasma treatment, the microfluidic channels were integrated with single nanowire biosensors. This microfluidic biosensor showed a high sensitivity with about ~0.5 % change in conductance at the lowest IgE protein concentration of 10 pM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420190      PMCID: PMC3651753          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-013-9752-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device.

Authors:  T Thorsen; R W Roberts; F H Arnold; S R Quake
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 2.  Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  J C McDonald; D C Duffy; J R Anderson; D T Chiu; H Wu; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Latest developments in micro total analysis systems.

Authors:  Arun Arora; Giuseppina Simone; Georgette B Salieb-Beugelaar; Jung Tae Kim; Andreas Manz
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Label-free reading of microarray-based immunoassays with surface plasmon resonance imaging.

Authors:  Vishal Kanda; James K Kariuki; D Jed Harrison; Mark T McDermott
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Microfluidic device as a new platform for immunofluorescent detection of viruses.

Authors:  Wen-Tso Liu; Liang Zhu; Qi-Wei Qin; Qing Zhang; Hanhua Feng; Simon Ang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  On-chip enzyme immunoassay of a cardiac marker using a microfluidic device combined with a portable surface plasmon resonance system.

Authors:  Ryoji Kurita; Yoshimi Yokota; Yukari Sato; Fumio Mizutani; Osamu Niwa
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Affinity capture and detection of immunoglobulin E in human serum using an aptamer-modified surface in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jacquelyn R Cole; Lawrence W Dick; Elizabeth J Morgan; Linda B McGown
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Electrochemical microfluidic biosensor for the detection of nucleic acid sequences.

Authors:  Vasiliy N Goral; Natalya V Zaytseva; Antje J Baeumner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 9.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices.

Authors:  J Cooper McDonald; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Effects of drying methods and additives on structure and function of actin: mechanisms of dehydration-induced damage and its inhibition.

Authors:  S D Allison; T W Randolph; M C Manning; K Middleton; A Davis; J F Carpenter
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 4.013

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.