Literature DB >> 23420176

Structural characterization of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cluster in Calyptratae (Diptera: Schizophora) and its implications for molecular phylogenetic analyses.

M A T Marinho1, A M L Azeredo-Espin, N I T Zanchin.   

Abstract

The internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the eukaryotic ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cluster plays an essential role in processing of the ribosomal RNA, which is primarily accomplished by the secondary structures acquired by the molecule after transcription. Two possible structural conformation models have been proposed for the ITS2 region, the "ring model" and the "hairpin model," and the former has been widely used in many molecular phylogenetic analyses incorporating structural information available to date. To evaluate the validity of this model, in vitro transcribed ITS2 molecules from species representing the three superfamilies of the Calyptratae clade (Diptera: Schizophora), namely Cochliomyia hominivorax, Musca domestica, and Glossina morsitans, were submitted to enzymatic digestion with single- and double-stranded specific nucleases (RNases I, A, T1, and V1). The resulting fragments were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis and digestion sites were mapped in the secondary structure models which were obtained by in silico prediction with further refinement by homology comparisons. The pattern of RNA fragments generated by these RNases show a high degree of correlation to most of the predicted helix-loop regions and structural motifs. Discrepancies to the models can be explained by alternative structural conformation dynamics (in M. domestica and G. morsitans) and by higher-order factors (such as tertiary interactions) that may stabilize thermodynamically unfavored structures (in C. hominivorax).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420176     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-013-9548-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  60 in total

1.  RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  N J Savill; D C Hoyle; P G Higgs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Homology modeling revealed more than 20,000 rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures.

Authors:  Matthias Wolf; Marco Achtziger; Jörg Schultz; Thomas Dandekar; Tobias Müller
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Probing the secondary structure of expansion segment ES6 in 18S ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  Gunnar Alkemar; Odd Nygård
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  RNA folding during transcription.

Authors:  Tao Pan; Tobin Sosnick
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2006

5.  Analysis of the secondary structure of expansion segment 39 in ribosomes from fungi, plants and mammals.

Authors:  Odd Nygård; Gunnar Alkemar; Sofia L Larsson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  RNA folding: conformational statistics, folding kinetics, and ion electrostatics.

Authors:  Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Evolutionary analyses of DNA sequences subject to constraints of secondary structure.

Authors:  S V Muse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria.

Authors:  Maximilian J Telford; Michael J Wise; Vivek Gowri-Shankar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Structural analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 of the precursor ribosomal RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L C Yeh; J C Lee
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The 3' end of yeast 5.8S rRNA is generated by an exonuclease processing mechanism.

Authors:  P Mitchell; E Petfalski; D Tollervey
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.