Literature DB >> 15689526

Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria.

Maximilian J Telford1, Michael J Wise, Vivek Gowri-Shankar.   

Abstract

Sequences from ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have made a huge contribution to our current understanding of metazoan phylogeny and indeed the phylogeny of all of life. That said, some parts of this rRNA-based phylogeny remain unresolved. One approach to increase the resolution of these trees would be to use more appropriate models of sequence evolution in phylogenetic analysis. RNAs transcribed from rRNA genes have a complex secondary structure mediated by base pairing between sometimes distant regions of the rRNA molecule. The pairing between the stem nucleotides has important consequences for their evolution which differs from that of unpaired loop nucleotides. These differences in evolution should ideally be accounted for when using rRNA sequences for phylogeny estimation. We use a novel permutation approach to demonstrate the significant superiority of models of sequence evolution that allow stem and loop regions to evolve according to separate models and, in common with previous studies, we show that 16-state models that take base pairing of stems into account are significantly better than simpler, 4-state, single-nucleotide models. One of these 16-state models has been applied to the phylogeny of the Bilateria using small subunit rRNA (SSU) sequences. Our optimal tree largely echoes previous results based on SSU in particular supporting the tripartite Bilaterian tree of deuterostomes, lophotrochozoans, and ecdysozoans. There are also a number of differences, however, perhaps most important of which is the observation of a clade consisting of the gastrotrichs plus platyheminthes that is basal to all other lophotrochozoan taxa. Use of 16-state models also appears to reduce the Bayesian support given to certain biologically improbable groups found using standard 4-state models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689526     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) as a molecular marker for phylogenetic inference using sequence and secondary structure information in blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae).

Authors:  M A T Marinho; A C M Junqueira; A M L Azeredo-Espin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Folding and finding RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  David H Mathews; Walter N Moss; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches: case studies with diploblast LSU.

Authors:  Dirk Erpenbeck; Scott A Nichols; Oliver Voigt; Martin Dohrmann; Bernard M Degnan; John N A Hooper; Gert Wörheide
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Prokaryotic and eukaryotic features observed on the secondary structures of Giardia SSU rRNAs and its phylogenetic implications.

Authors:  Ui Wook Hwang
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Compositional properties and thermal adaptation of 18S rRNA in vertebrates.

Authors:  Annalisa Varriale; Giuseppe Torelli; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Structural diversity of eukaryotic 18S rRNA and its impact on alignment and phylogenetic reconstruction.

Authors:  Qiang Xie; Jinzhong Lin; Yan Qin; Jianfu Zhou; Wenjun Bu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 14.870

7.  Structural characterization of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cluster in Calyptratae (Diptera: Schizophora) and its implications for molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  M A T Marinho; A M L Azeredo-Espin; N I T Zanchin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  An updated 18S rRNA phylogeny of tunicates based on mixture and secondary structure models.

Authors:  Georgia Tsagkogeorga; Xavier Turon; Russell R Hopcroft; Marie-Ka Tilak; Tamar Feldstein; Noa Shenkar; Yossi Loya; Dorothée Huchon; Emmanuel J P Douzery; Frédéric Delsuc
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Data mining approach identifies research priorities and data requirements for resolving the red algal tree of life.

Authors:  Heroen Verbruggen; Christine A Maggs; Gary W Saunders; Line Le Gall; Hwan Su Yoon; Olivier De Clerck
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.