Literature DB >> 23417433

Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Seung Hyuk Baik1, Nam Kyu Kim, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung So Min, Kang Young Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgery is a new and emerging surgical procedure for rectal cancer patients. However, there is a lack of information regarding oncologic outcomes for this procedure. We aimed to evaluate oncologic and perioperative clinicopathologic outcomes of surgical resection using robotic instruments for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Data from rectal cancer patients (n = 370) diagnosed with stage I-IV disease sited below 15 cm from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision consecutively from June 2006 to December 2010 were evaluated. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative clinicopathologic outcomes, postoperative complications, 3-year overall survival rate, and 3-year disease-free survival rate were analyzed.
RESULTS: All patients underwent robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision. Of all postoperative pathologic stages, 15 (4.1 %) were stage 0 (pathologic complete remission), 126 (34.1 %) stage I, 95 (25.7 %) stage II, 118 (31.9 %) stage III, and 16 (4.3 %) stage IV. The 3-year overall survival rate was 93.1 % (pathologic complete remission = 100 %, stage I = 99.2 %, stage II = 97.1 %, stage III = 90.1 %, and stage IV = 48.4 %). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 79.2 % (pathologic complete remission = 100 %, stage I = 93.7 %, stage II = 79.8 %, stage III = 69.6 %, and stage IV = 0.0 %). The 3-year cumulative local recurrence rate was 3.6 % (n = 10). The circumferential resection margin positive rate was 5.7 % (n = 21). Local recurrence developed in one patient and systemic recurrence developed in five patients. The total number of patients with postoperative complications was 86 (23.2 %).
CONCLUSIONS: These data show the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417433     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2895-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

Review 1.  Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Fabrizio Luca; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Sabina Cenciarelli; Wanda Petz; Igor Monsellato; Manuela Valvo; Maria Laura Cossu; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Kassem Shmaissany
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P C Sivathondan; D G Jayne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furuatni; Shoichi Manabe; Yusuke Yamaoka; Hitoshi Hino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  W Konrad Karcz; William von Braun
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

Review 6.  Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Chang Hee Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections with respect to 30-day perioperative morbidity.

Authors:  Adina E Feinberg; Ahmad Elnahas; Shaheena Bashir; Michelle C Cleghorn; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Chinock Cheong; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10

9.  Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Chang Woo Kim; Min Soo Cho; Seung Hyuk Baik; Dong Wook Kim; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis.

Authors:  Scott C Dolejs; Joshua A Waters; Eugene P Ceppa; Ben L Zarzaur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.