Literature DB >> 29203993

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Chinock Cheong1, Nam Kyu Kim1.   

Abstract

Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic resection; Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic resection

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203993      PMCID: PMC5705499          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  67 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

3.  Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Gregorio Di Franco; Matteo Palmeri; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Luigi Cobuccio; Emanuele Marciano; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 8.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte L Deijen; Simone Velthuis; Alice Tsai; Stella Mavroveli; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Colin Sietses; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Antonio M Lacy; George B Hanna; H Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inter-institutional Travel Fellowships-a Need for the Young Surgical Oncologists.

Authors:  Rajesh S Shinde; Nam Kyu Kim; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15

2.  Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort.

Authors:  Valentin Schnitzbauer; Michael Gerken; Stefan Benz; Vinzenz Völkel; Teresa Draeger; Alois Fürst; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial.

Authors:  Katie Jones; Mohamed G Qassem; Parv Sains; Mirza K Baig; Muhammad S Sajid
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.