Literature DB >> 22154544

Understanding recovery from object substitution masking.

Stephanie C Goodhew1, Paul E Dux, Ottmar V Lipp, Troy A W Visser.   

Abstract

When we look at a scene, we are conscious of only a small fraction of the available visual information at any given point in time. This raises profound questions regarding how information is selected, when awareness occurs, and the nature of the mechanisms underlying these processes. One tool that may be used to probe these issues is object-substitution masking (OSM). In OSM, a sparse, temporally-trailing four dot mask can interfere with target perception, even though the target and mask have different contours and do not spatially overlap (Enns & Di Lollo, 1997). Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the recently discovered recovery from OSM observed with prolonged mask exposure (Goodhew, Visser, Lipp, & Dux, 2011). In three experiments, we demonstrate that recovery is unaffected by mask offset, and that prolonged physical exposure of the mask is not necessary for recovery. These findings confirm that recovery is not due to: (a) an offset transient impairing the visibility of other stimuli that are nearby in space and time, or (b) mask adaptation or temporal object-individuation cues resulting from prolonged mask exposure. Instead, our results confirm recovery as a high-level visual-cognitive phenomenon, which is inherently tied to target-processing time. This reveals the prolonged iterative temporal dynamics of conscious object perception.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22154544     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  5 in total

1.  What was that object? On the role of identity information in the formation of object files and conscious object perception.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-25

Review 2.  Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Jay Pratt; Paul E Dux; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  The inevitable contrast: Conscious vs. unconscious processes in action control.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; T Andrew Poehlman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-10

4.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Perception of invisible masked objects in early infancy.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakashima; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.