Literature DB >> 36109353

What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task.

Eldad Keha1,2, Eyal Kalanthroff3.   

Abstract

The Stroop task is characterized by two types of conflicts-information conflict (between the incongruent word and ink color) and task conflict (between the relevant color-naming task and the competing, irrelevant, stimulus-driven, word reading task). It is not yet clear what stimuli trigger the task of reading, and thus task conflict, and to what extent. In the current study, we applied a novel low-control (high neutral proportion) between-subject design to test the effect of different neutral conditions (symbols, same-letter strings, illegal-letter strings, pseudo-words, and real-words) on task conflict, in both manual and vocal response-types. Results indicated that in the manual task, a reverse facilitation effect, a signature of task conflict, appeared in all non-word conditions in a similar magnitude, but did not appear in the real-words condition. In the vocal task, reverse facilitation was found only in the symbols condition, regular facilitation was exhibited in all other neutral conditions, and larger facilitation appeared in the real-words condition. Our results indicate that the reading process and the activation of task conflict, depend on response-types (manual vs. vocal). In both response-types we found support for a word superiority effect, such that words trigger task conflict to a greater extent, however, we only observed an orthographic effect in the vocal response-type where stimuli consisting of letters triggered the reading task. We concluded that in the manual response-type, conflict arises only in the lexical route, whilst in the vocal response-type, conflict arises in the lexical and orthographic routes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36109353     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  42 in total

1.  No negative semantic priming from unconscious flanker words in sight.

Authors:  Katia Duscherer; Daniel Holender
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; M Mintun; J D Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Nitzan Shahar
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-25

5.  Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Olga Entel; Joseph Tzelgov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-03

6.  Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test.

Authors:  C J Bench; C D Frith; P M Grasby; K J Friston; E Paulesu; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.

Authors:  J R Binder; K A McKiernan; M E Parsons; C F Westbury; E T Possing; J N Kaufman; L Buchanan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Esther Aarts; Ardi Roelofs; Miranda van Turennout
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Editorial: The Locus of the Stroop Effect.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.