Literature DB >> 23415854

Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?

Jeffrey Skolnick1, Hongyi Zhou, Mu Gao.   

Abstract

The recently developed field of ligand homology modeling (LHM) that extends the ideas of protein homology modeling to the prediction of ligand binding sites and for use in virtual ligand screening has emerged as a powerful new approach. Unlike traditional docking methodologies, LHM can be applied to low-to-moderate resolution predicted as well as experimental structures with little if any diminution in performance; thereby enabling ≈ 75% of an average proteome to have potentially significant virtual screening predictions. In large scale benchmarking, LHM is able to predict off-target ligand binding. Thus, despite the widespread belief to the contrary, low-to-moderate resolution predicted structures have considerable utility for biochemical function prediction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415854      PMCID: PMC3659186          DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  65 in total

1.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  B Kramer; M Rarey; T Lengauer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-11-01

2.  Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking.

Authors:  P Aloy; E Querol; F X Aviles; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure.

Authors:  A H Elcock
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.

Authors:  Jon A Erickson; Mehran Jalaie; Daniel H Robertson; Richard A Lewis; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure.

Authors:  M J Ondrechen; J G Clifton; D Ringe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ligand binding-induced conformational changes in riboflavin kinase: structural basis for the ordered mechanism.

Authors:  Subramanian Karthikeyan; Qingxian Zhou; Andrei L Osterman; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Mark E Devries; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  GLIDA: GPCR--ligand database for chemical genomics drug discovery--database and tools update.

Authors:  Yasushi Okuno; Akiko Tamon; Hiroaki Yabuuchi; Satoshi Niijima; Yohsuke Minowa; Koichiro Tonomura; Ryo Kunimoto; Chunlai Feng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Authors:  Guang Qiang Dong; Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 3.  Protein modeling: what happened to the "protein structure gap"?

Authors:  Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Computational methods and tools for binding site recognition between proteins and small molecules: from classical geometrical approaches to modern machine learning strategies.

Authors:  Gabriele Macari; Daniele Toti; Fabio Polticelli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Template-based prediction of protein function.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; T Scott Chen; Lei Deng; Jose Ignacio Garzon; Howook Hwang; Gorka Lasso; Hunjoong Lee; Antonina Silkov; Barry Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Inhibition of protein interactions: co-crystalized protein-protein interfaces are nearly as good as holo proteins in rigid-body ligand docking.

Authors:  Saveliy Belkin; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Drug-Like Protein-Protein Interaction Modulators: Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology.

Authors:  Bruno O Villoutreix; Melaine A Kuenemann; Jean-Luc Poyet; Heriberto Bruzzoni-Giovanelli; Céline Labbé; David Lagorce; Olivier Sperandio; Maria A Miteva
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.353

8.  Re-annotation of the sequence > annotation: opportunities for the functional microbiologist.

Authors:  Francisco Barona-Gómez
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  Predicting Ligand Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces by 3-Dimensional Probability Density Distributions of Interacting Atoms.

Authors:  Jhih-Wei Jian; Pavadai Elumalai; Thejkiran Pitti; Chih Yuan Wu; Keng-Chang Tsai; Jeng-Yih Chang; Hung-Pin Peng; An-Suei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.