Janet A DiPietro1, Matthew A Goldshore1, Katie T Kivlighan1, Heather A Pater1, Kathleen A Costigan2. 1. a Department of Population , Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA and. 2. b Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The maternal experience of having a young infant is often viewed through a negative lens focused on psychological distress due, in part, to a historical focus on identifying threats to prenatal, perinatal and postpartum well-being of women and infants. This report examines maternal appraisal of both positive and negative experiences during and after pregnancy and introduces a new scale that assesses both uplifts and hassles that are specific to early motherhood. METHODS: The sample included 136 women who began study participation during pregnancy and completed an existing scale designed to evaluate pregnancy-specific hassles and uplifts. When infants were 6 months old, participants completed the newly developed Maternal Experience Scale (MES) along with questionnaires related to anxiety, depression, attachment, parenting stress and infant temperament characteristics. RESULTS: In general, women with 6-month-old infants rated their maternal experiences far more positively than negatively. MES hassles and uplift scores reflected both convergent and discriminant validity with general measures of psychological well-being and parent-specific measures. Appraisal of the pregnancy experience significantly predicted appraisal of early motherhood for hassles, uplifts and a composite score reflecting emotional valence. Women became relatively more uplifted and less hassled from pregnancy to 6-month postpartum; this was particularly true for multiparous women. DISCUSSION: The maternal perception of motherhood corresponds to her perception of pregnancy. The MES provides a balanced view of motherhood by including maternal appraisal of the uplifting aspects of caring for an infant.
INTRODUCTION: The maternal experience of having a young infant is often viewed through a negative lens focused on psychological distress due, in part, to a historical focus on identifying threats to prenatal, perinatal and postpartum well-being of women and infants. This report examines maternal appraisal of both positive and negative experiences during and after pregnancy and introduces a new scale that assesses both uplifts and hassles that are specific to early motherhood. METHODS: The sample included 136 women who began study participation during pregnancy and completed an existing scale designed to evaluate pregnancy-specific hassles and uplifts. When infants were 6 months old, participants completed the newly developed Maternal Experience Scale (MES) along with questionnaires related to anxiety, depression, attachment, parenting stress and infant temperament characteristics. RESULTS: In general, women with 6-month-old infants rated their maternal experiences far more positively than negatively. MES hassles and uplift scores reflected both convergent and discriminant validity with general measures of psychological well-being and parent-specific measures. Appraisal of the pregnancy experience significantly predicted appraisal of early motherhood for hassles, uplifts and a composite score reflecting emotional valence. Women became relatively more uplifted and less hassled from pregnancy to 6-month postpartum; this was particularly true for multiparous women. DISCUSSION: The maternal perception of motherhood corresponds to her perception of pregnancy. The MES provides a balanced view of motherhood by including maternal appraisal of the uplifting aspects of caring for an infant.
Authors: Jennifer L Barkin; Katherine L Wisner; Joyce T Bromberger; Scott R Beach; Stephen R Wisniewski Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Barbara Zych; Witold Błaż; Ewa Dmoch-Gajzlerska; Katarzyna Kanadys; Anna Lewandowska; Małgorzata Nagórska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390