Literature DB >> 23415065

White-to-white corneal diameter differences in moderately and highly myopic eyes: partial coherence interferometry versus scanning-slit topography.

Raul Martin1, Sara Ortiz, Ana Rio-Cristobal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between Orbscan scanning-slit topography and IOLMaster partial coherence interferometry (PCI) white-to-white (WTW) measurements in moderately and highly myopic eyes.
SETTING: IOBA-Eye Institute, University of Valladolid, Spain.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Myopic eyes were divided according to the degree of myopia as follows: Group 1 (<6.00 diopters [D]), Group 2 (between 6.00 D and 12.00 D), and Group 3 (>12.00 D). The WTW distance was measured with the scanning-slit topography and PCI devices.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 328 eyes (64 subjects). The mean WTW in all eyes was 0.50 mm ± 0.26 (SD), lower with scanning-slit topography (11.69 ± 0.37 mm) than with PCI (12.19 ± 0.40 mm) (P<.01, paired t test). A low mean WTW was found in Group 2 (11.65 ± 0.34 and 12.15 ± 0.36 mm, scanning-slit topography and PCI, respectively) and Group 3 (11.51 ± 0.36 and 12.05 ± 0.46 mm, respectively) compared with Group 1 (11.79 ± 0.38 and 12.26 ± 0.40 mm, respectively) (P<.03, analysis of variance with Games-Howell correction). There was a low statistically significant relationship between WTW and spherical equivalent (SE) with both devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with moderate and high degrees of myopia had lower WTW diameters than eyes with low spherical equivalent myopia measured with both devices. Scanning-slit topography provided less WTW distance than PCI in myopic eyes; thus, the devices are not clinically interchangeable.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415065     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens.

Authors:  Manuel Garza-Leon; Hugo A Fuentes-de la Fuente; Ana V García-Treviño
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy Iranian population obtained with the Orbscan II.

Authors:  Hamid Gharaee; Mojtaba Abrishami; Masoud Shafiee; Asieh Ehsaei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Analysis of Age, Gender, and Refractive Error-Related Changes of the Anterior Corneal Surface Parameters Using Oculus Keratograph Topography.

Authors:  Nasrin Moghadas Sharif; Negareh Yazdani; Leila Shahkarami; Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam; Asieh Ehsaei
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-04

4.  A machine learning-based algorithm used to estimate the physiological elongation of ocular axial length in myopic children.

Authors:  Tao Tang; Zekuan Yu; Qiong Xu; Zisu Peng; Yuzhuo Fan; Kai Wang; Qiushi Ren; Jia Qu; Mingwei Zhao
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-22

5.  Confounding sizing in posterior chamber phakic lens selection due to white-to-white measurement bias.

Authors:  JoaquIn Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; Elisa Hueso; David P Piñero
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Phakic intraocular lens: Getting the right size.

Authors:  Kalyaani Deshpande; Rushad Shroff; Partha Biswas; Kamal Kapur; Naren Shetty; Ann Sarah Koshy; Pooja Khamar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Comparison of white-to-white measurements using four devices and their determination of ICL sizing.

Authors:  Robert Edward T Ang; Edward Kenneth F Reyes; Fernando Amado J Ayuyao; Maria Isabel N Umali; Emerson M Cruz
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-02

8.  Comparison of the Orbscan II topographer and the iTrace aberrometer for the measurements of keratometry and corneal diameter in myopic patients.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Xiaobo Xia
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.