| Literature DB >> 23414575 |
Georg M Schuetz1, Peter Schlattmann, Stephan Achenbach, Matthew Budoff, Mario J Garcia, Robert Roehle, Gianluca Pontone, Willem Bob Meijboom, Daniele Andreini, Hatem Alkadhi, Lily Honoris, Nuno Bettencourt, Jörg Hausleiter, Sebastian Leschka, Bernhard L Gerber, Matthijs Fl Meijs, Abbas Arjmand Shabestari, Akira Sato, Elke Zimmermann, Uwe J Schoepf, Axel Diederichsen, David A Halon, Vladimir Mendoza-Rodriguez, Ashraf Hamdan, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Harald Brodoefel, Kristian A Ovrehus, Shona Mm Jenkins, Bjørn A Halvorsen, Johannes Rixe, Mehraj Sheikh, Christoph Langer, Eugenio Martuscelli, Andrea Romagnoli, Arthur Jha Scholte, Roy P Marcus, Geir R Ulimoen, Koen Nieman, Hans Mickley, Konstantin Nikolaou, Jean-Claude Tardif, Thorsten Rc Johnson, Simone Muraglia, Benjamin Jw Chow, David Maintz, Michael Laule, Marc Dewey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualization and detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, there is considerable debate regarding the optimal target population to maximize clinical performance and patient benefit. The most obvious indication for noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease would be to reliably exclude significant stenosis and, thus, avoid unnecessary invasive conventional coronary angiography. To do this, a test should have, at clinically appropriate pretest likelihoods, minimal false-negative outcomes resulting in a high negative predictive value. However, little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on the clinical predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. Previous regular systematic reviews and meta-analyses had to rely on limited summary patient cohort data offered by primary studies. Performing an individual patient data meta-analysis will enable a much more detailed and powerful analysis and thus increase representativeness and generalizability of the results. The individual patient data meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CoMe-CCT, CRD42012002780). METHODS/Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23414575 PMCID: PMC3576350 DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Syst Rev ISSN: 2046-4053
Figure 1Predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. The population-averaged predictive values (based on published studies and their summary results) are shown as blue (positive) and green (negative) curves with their 95% confidence intervals based on the published studies (circles). The negative predictive values are shown as 1-negative predictive values to avoid overlap with the positive predictive value curve. The number of patients included in the published studies is indicated by the size of the circles. The dashed lines indicate the predefined minimal predictive values on the y-axis (90% for negative and 70% for the positive predictive values). Such analyses are limited because only the published predictive values in the studies and the calculated prevalences (but not the pretest likelihoods [7-9]) are available. Thus, individual patient data (IPD) from a collaborative meta-analysis can overcome these limitations and draw more meaningful conclusions about the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Image reproduced from: Schlattmann P, Schuetz GM, Dewey M: Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: a meta-regression analysis. Eur Radiol 2011, 21(9):1904–1913 [12].
Obligatory computed tomography technology and patient characteristics requested in the data file
| Publication from which the data is derived | Age and gender, type of symptoms (typical angina pectoris, atypical angina pectoris, chest pain, no pain, pain unknown) |
| Results of CT (positivea, negative, nondiagnosticb). Comment and explanation for nondiagnostic patients | Results of conventional coronary angiography (positivea, negative, nondiagnosticb). Comment and explanation for nondiagnostic patients |
aAt least one ≥50% stenosis in one vessel; bno stenosis in any vessel and at least one vessel not fully evaluable.
Additional computed tomography technology and patient characteristics requested in the data file
| Effective radiation dose | Weight and height |
| Type of electrocardiographic gating | Derived body mass index |
| Number of detector rows used | Calcium score, heart rate during scanning, presence of cardiac risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, current or former smoker, positive family history, prior myocardial infarction) |
| Beta blockade (type, route, dosage) | Results of rest electrocardiography |
| Nitroglycerin (type, dosage) | Results of stress electrocardiography |
| Contrast agent (type, concentration, flow, amount) | Results of stress echocardiography |
| Breath hold duration | Results of stress scintigraphy |