OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in resource use and cost between older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) over time. DESIGN: Multicenter, longitudinal study. SETTING: Sixty-eight Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-nine individuals diagnosed with MCI and 107 cognitively normal elderly adults followed annually for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: The Resource Use Instrument (RUI) was used to capture medical and nonmedical care use. Generalized linear latent and mixed models were used to estimate differences in resource use and costs in older adults with and without MCI after controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: At baseline, average annual direct medical cost per person was substantially higher for participants with MCI ($6,499) than for those without ($2,969) P < .001). Informal care use was also substantially higher (33% vs 8.4%, P < .001). Results from multivariate analyses of longitudinal data show that, after controlling for participant and informant characteristics, direct medical costs were 44% higher for participants with MCI than for those without. Participants with MCI were almost five times as likely to use informal care as those without. Number of medical conditions and older age were associated with higher medical cost. Worse functional and cognitive status, older age, being married, and being female were associated with higher likelihood of informal care use. Having an adult child informant was associated with higher likelihood of using informal care. CONCLUSION: The RUI captured differences in resource use and costs between individuals with and without MCI. Clinicians who care for individuals with MCI should address informal care needs early in the disease course.
OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in resource use and cost between older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) over time. DESIGN: Multicenter, longitudinal study. SETTING: Sixty-eight Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-nine individuals diagnosed with MCI and 107 cognitively normal elderly adults followed annually for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: The Resource Use Instrument (RUI) was used to capture medical and nonmedical care use. Generalized linear latent and mixed models were used to estimate differences in resource use and costs in older adults with and without MCI after controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: At baseline, average annual direct medical cost per person was substantially higher for participants with MCI ($6,499) than for those without ($2,969) P < .001). Informal care use was also substantially higher (33% vs 8.4%, P < .001). Results from multivariate analyses of longitudinal data show that, after controlling for participant and informant characteristics, direct medical costs were 44% higher for participants with MCI than for those without. Participants with MCI were almost five times as likely to use informal care as those without. Number of medical conditions and older age were associated with higher medical cost. Worse functional and cognitive status, older age, being married, and being female were associated with higher likelihood of informal care use. Having an adult child informant was associated with higher likelihood of using informal care. CONCLUSION: The RUI captured differences in resource use and costs between individuals with and without MCI. Clinicians who care for individuals with MCI should address informal care needs early in the disease course.
Authors: R C Mohs; D Knopman; R C Petersen; S H Ferris; C Ernesto; M Grundman; M Sano; L Bieliauskas; D Geldmacher; C Clark; L J Thal Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Mary Sano; Carolyn W Zhu; Peter J Whitehouse; Steven Edland; Shelia Jin; Karin Ernstrom; Ronald G Thomas; Leon J Thal; Steven H Ferris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2006 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Melanie Luppa; Sven Heinrich; Herbert Matschinger; Anke Hensel; Tobias Luck; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Sarah F Marshall; Dennis Deapen; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Leslie Bernstein; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Rich Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Ronald K Ross; Dee West; Al Ziogas Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kathryn E Callahan; James F Lovato; Michael E Miller; Doug Easterling; Beth Snitz; Jeff D Williamson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cynthia L Leibson; Kirsten Hall Long; Jeanine E Ransom; Rosebud O Roberts; Steven L Hass; Amy M Duhig; Carin Y Smith; Jane A Emerson; V Shane Pankratz; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Robert J Dawe; Lei Yu; Julie A Schneider; Konstantinos Arfanakis; David A Bennett; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jennifer C Davis; Stirling Bryan; Carlo A Marra; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Teresa Liu-Ambrose Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Rebecca M Lovett; Laura M Curtis; Stephen D Persell; James W Griffith; Derin Cobia; Alex Federman; Michael S Wolf Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-03-12
Authors: Dayeon Shin; Simona C Kwon; Mi Hye Kim; Kyung Won Lee; Soe Yeon Choi; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hébert; Hae-Kyung Chung Journal: Nutrition Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.008