Cynthia L Leibson1, Kirsten Hall Long2, Jeanine E Ransom3, Rosebud O Roberts4, Steven L Hass5, Amy M Duhig5, Carin Y Smith3, Jane A Emerson3, V Shane Pankratz3, Ronald C Petersen4. 1. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: leibson@mayo.edu. 2. K Long Health Economics Consulting LLC, St. Paul, MN, USA. 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Objective cost estimates and source of cost differences are needed across the spectrum of cognition, including cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia. METHODS: Subjects were a subset of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging stratified-random sampling of Olmsted County, MN, residents aged 70 to 89 years. A neurologist reviewed provider-linked medical records to identify prevalent dementia (review date = index). Remaining subjects were invited to participate in prospective clinical/neuropsychological assessments; participants were categorized as CN, MCI, or newly discovered dementia (assessment date = index). Costs for medical services/procedures 1-year pre-index (excluding indirect and long-term care costs) were estimated using line-item provider-linked administrative data. We estimated contributions of care-delivery site and comorbid conditions (including and excluding neuropsychiatric diagnoses) to between-category cost differences. RESULTS: Annual mean medical costs for CN, MCI, newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia were $6042, $6784, $9431, $11,678, respectively. Hospital inpatient costs contributed 70% of total costs for prevalent dementia and accounted for differences between CN and both prevalent and newly discovered dementia. Ambulatory costs accounted for differences between CN and MCI. Age-, sex-, education-adjusted differences reached significance for CN versus newly discovered and prevalent dementia and for MCI versus prevalent dementia. After considering all comorbid diagnoses, between-category differences were reduced (e.g., prevalent dementia minus MCI (from $4842 to $3575); newly discovered dementia minus CN (from $3578 to $711)). Following the exclusion of neuropsychiatric diagnoses from comorbidity adjustment, between-category differences tended to revert to greater differences. CONCLUSIONS: Cost estimates did not differ significantly between CN and MCI. Substantial differences between MCI and prevalent dementia reflected high inpatient costs for dementia and appear partly related to co-occurring mental disorders. Such comparisons can help inform models aimed at identifying where, when, and for which individuals proposed interventions might be cost-effective.
BACKGROUND: Objective cost estimates and source of cost differences are needed across the spectrum of cognition, including cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia. METHODS: Subjects were a subset of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging stratified-random sampling of Olmsted County, MN, residents aged 70 to 89 years. A neurologist reviewed provider-linked medical records to identify prevalent dementia (review date = index). Remaining subjects were invited to participate in prospective clinical/neuropsychological assessments; participants were categorized as CN, MCI, or newly discovered dementia (assessment date = index). Costs for medical services/procedures 1-year pre-index (excluding indirect and long-term care costs) were estimated using line-item provider-linked administrative data. We estimated contributions of care-delivery site and comorbid conditions (including and excluding neuropsychiatric diagnoses) to between-category cost differences. RESULTS: Annual mean medical costs for CN, MCI, newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia were $6042, $6784, $9431, $11,678, respectively. Hospital inpatient costs contributed 70% of total costs for prevalent dementia and accounted for differences between CN and both prevalent and newly discovered dementia. Ambulatory costs accounted for differences between CN and MCI. Age-, sex-, education-adjusted differences reached significance for CN versus newly discovered and prevalent dementia and for MCI versus prevalent dementia. After considering all comorbid diagnoses, between-category differences were reduced (e.g., prevalent dementia minus MCI (from $4842 to $3575); newly discovered dementia minus CN (from $3578 to $711)). Following the exclusion of neuropsychiatric diagnoses from comorbidity adjustment, between-category differences tended to revert to greater differences. CONCLUSIONS: Cost estimates did not differ significantly between CN and MCI. Substantial differences between MCI and prevalent dementia reflected high inpatient costs for dementia and appear partly related to co-occurring mental disorders. Such comparisons can help inform models aimed at identifying where, when, and for which individuals proposed interventions might be cost-effective.
Authors: Elaine D Eaker; Susan F Mickel; Po Huang Chyou; Nancy J Mueller-Rizner; Joshua P Slusser Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca; Eric B Larson; Mary Ganguli Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Melanie Luppa; Sven Heinrich; Herbert Matschinger; Anke Hensel; Tobias Luck; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Taylor J Krivanek; Seth A Gale; Brittany M McFeeley; Casey M Nicastri; Kirk R Daffner Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Niels Janssen; Ron L Handels; Anders Wimo; Riitta Antikainen; Tiina Laatikainen; Hilkka Soininen; Timo Strandberg; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Miia Kivipelto; Silvia M A A Evers; Frans R J Verhey; Tiia Ngandu Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Jane A Emerson; Carin Y Smith; Kirsten H Long; Jeanine E Ransom; Rosebud O Roberts; Steven L Hass; Amy M Duhig; Ronald C Petersen; Cynthia L Leibson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kumar B Rajan; Jennifer Weuve; Lisa L Barnes; Elizabeth A McAninch; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 16.655