Literature DB >> 23412945

Differential evaluations of alcohol-related consequences among emerging adults.

Helene R White1, Anne E Ray.   

Abstract

Personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) to reduce drinking in college students often provide feedback about negative alcohol-related consequences experienced by students to motivate them to drink less. Yet, there is evidence which suggests that not everyone perceives consequences as negative and raises questions regarding the utility of consequence-specific feedback for some individuals. The purpose of the current study was to extend this research to examine salience of consequences among both college and non-college emerging adults, differences in ratings by sex, age, and frequency of experiencing consequences, and the relationship between salience measured in emerging adulthood and drinking patterns in young adulthood. Data were from an accelerated cohort study of males and females (N = 1,308), who were either age 18, 21, or 24 years at the time of consequence evaluation and followed-up 7 years later. Most experienced consequences were rated as at least a little bothersome. Regression analyses indicated that females, older participants, and those who experienced a consequence more often evaluated consequences as more bothersome but there were no differences by college status. Mean ratings of bother did not predict quitting drinking or alcohol problems 7 years later, whereas the number of consequences experienced did. Overall, the results suggest that most consequences are rated similarly by emerging adults regardless of college attendance but that feedback on consequences may be more salient for females and older emerging adults. PFIs may need to differ in the types of feedback they provide depending on demographic characteristics and baseline level of alcohol problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23412945      PMCID: PMC3715555          DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0360-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  25 in total

1.  The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample.

Authors:  B O Muthén; L K Muthén
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

Authors:  Elizabeth T Miller; Dan J Neal; Lisa J Roberts; John S Baer; Sally O Cressler; Jane Metrik; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-03

3.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.

Authors:  Susan E Collins; Kate B Carey; Martin J Sliwinski
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-09

Review 4.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Are all negative consequences truly negative? Assessing variations among college students' perceptions of alcohol related consequences.

Authors:  Kimberly A Mallett; Rachel L Bachrach; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities.

Authors:  M E Larimer; A P Turner; B K Anderson; J S Fader; J R Kilmer; R S Palmer; J M Cronce
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2001-05

7.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.

Authors:  H R White; E W Labouvie
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1989-01

8.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

9.  Becoming married, depression, and alcohol problems among young adults.

Authors:  A V Horwitz; H R White
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1991-09

10.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Trisha A Benson; Rudy E Vuchinich; Mary M Deskins; David Eakin; Amanda M Flood; Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy; Ohiana Torrealday
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-03
View more
  17 in total

1.  Posting Post-Blackout: A Qualitative Examination of the Positive and Negative Valence of Tweets Posted after "Blackout" Drinking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Rose Marie Ward; Benjamin C Riordan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-01-28

2.  The influence of context in the subjective evaluation of "negative" alcohol-related consequences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Rochelle K Rosen; Holly K Boyle; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Evaluations and Perceptions of Others' Evaluations of Negative Alcohol-Related Consequences Predict Negative Alcohol-Related Consequences Among College Drinkers.

Authors:  Dipali Venkataraman Rinker; Chelsie M Young; Heather Krieger; Jordanna Lembo; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  When do college students have less favorable views of drinking? Evaluations of alcohol experiences and positive and negative consequences.

Authors:  Anne M Fairlie; Jason J Ramirez; Megan E Patrick; Christine M Lee
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-08

5.  Distinctions in Alcohol-Induced Memory Impairment: A Mixed Methods Study of En Bloc Versus Fragmentary Blackouts.

Authors:  Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Drinking consequences and subsequent drinking in college students over 4 years.

Authors:  Julia A Martinez; Kenneth J Sher; Phillip K Wood
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-12

7.  Suggestibility is associated with alcohol self-administration, subjective alcohol effects, and self-reported drinking behavior.

Authors:  Bethany L Stangl; Randi M Schuster; Alyssa Schneider; Alyson Dechert; Kevin W Potter; Maya Hareli; Fahim Mahmud; Elgin R Yalin; Vijay A Ramchandani; Jodi M Gilman
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.153

8.  Hypothetical evaluations of positive and negative alcohol consequences in adolescents across various levels of drinking experience.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Hector I Lopez-Vergara; Nancy P Barnett; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-08-25

9.  Psychometric analysis and validity of the daily alcohol-related consequences and evaluations measure for young adults.

Authors:  Christine M Lee; Jessica M Cronce; Scott A Baldwin; Anne M Fairlie; David C Atkins; Megan E Patrick; Lindsey Zimmerman; Mary E Larimer; Barbara C Leigh
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-05-19

10.  Normative perceptions and past-year consequences as predictors of subjective evaluations and weekly drinking behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Jennifer P Read; Craig R Colder
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.