Literature DB >> 23412463

Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: methodological mistake: author response.

R Patcas.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23412463      PMCID: PMC3667509          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth.

Authors:  Raphael Patcas; Lukas Müller; Oliver Ullrich; Timo Peltomäki
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Statistics in biomedical laboratory and clinical science: applications, issues and pitfalls.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.

Authors:  R Patcas; G Markic; L Müller; O Ullrich; T Peltomäki; C J Kellenberger; C A Karlo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: methodological mistake.

Authors:  S Sabour; H Kermani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.