Literature DB >> 23412452

Short-term functional outcome after hip resurfacing surgery.

Thomas H Nijman1, Vanessa A Scholtes, Frank R A J de Meulemeester, Cor P van der Hart, Rudolf W Poolman.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a popular method for treating late stage osteoarthritis, especially in young and active patients. Most studies presenting short-term follow-up after hip resurfacing present radiographic or dual clinician-patient-related outcome. These kinds of outcomes are influenced by interpretation of the clinician and do not tell us much about functional outcome from the patients perspective. Today, functional outcome is often measured using patient-reported outcome instruments. We used the patient-reported 'Hip Disability and osteoarthritis Outcome Score' questionnaire, which has good measurement properties, to assess short-term functional outcome in 160 patients (mean follow-up of 2.6 years) after hip resurfacing surgery. Furthermore, we focused on pain, range of motion, subjective improvement and complications. The majority (86.9%) of patients was free of pain after surgery and range of motion improved significantly. Subjective improvement was indicated in 95% of the patients. Mean HOOS in 149 patients was 87.5. In total, there were 11 complications (6%), and deep infections contributed the most (3.4%). In general, short-term follow-up after hip resurfacing in this cohort showed good clinical and patient-reported functional outcome. When assessing the results of medical interventions, a good PRO instrument can give reliable and valuable information from the patients perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412452     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-0946-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Girard; M Lavigne; P-A Vendittoli; A G Roy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

2.  Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  Wolf-Christoph Witzleb; M Arnold; F Krummenauer; A Knecht; H Ranisch; K-P Günther
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Stephane G Bergeron; Nicholas M Desy; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Kevin Debiparshad; John Antoniou
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2009

4.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.

Authors:  R T Steffen; H P Pandit; J Palan; D J Beard; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

5.  Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips.

Authors:  D L Back; R Dalziel; D Young; A Shimmin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-03

6.  The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.

Authors:  C B Hing; D L Back; M Bailey; D A Young; R E Dalziel; A J Shimmin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

7.  Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.

Authors:  Benjamin C Bengs; Sophia N Sangiorgio; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Ryan M Nunley; Stephen J Raterman; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  Maria Klässbo; Eva Larsson; Eva Mannevik
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.